By George Neumayr on 11.13.08 @ 6:09AM
Obama is told by educrats to send his daughters into the
"trenches" of D.C.'s public school system.
In his haplessly earnest commitment to egalitarianism, Jimmy
Carter lugged around his own suitcase and sent his daughter Amy
to a D.C. public school. As she trotted off to Thaddeus Stevens
Elementary, Carter could console himself with the consistency of
his convictions.
Will Barack Obama follow Carter's example? the press wonders.
Washington, D.C.'s mayor, Adrian Fenty, wants him to, as do
Robert C. Bobb, president of the D.C.'s Board of Education, and
board member Mary Lord.
Bobb and Lord have ludicrously urged Obama to send his daughters
into the "trenches" of D.C.'s public school system. They
write that "no private option offers President-elect Obama a
personal reality check on the No Child Left Behind mandates he
campaigned to reform. Public school parents see test-prep
squeezing out art. They push for quality. As the law's
reauthorization looms, what better crash course on its impact
than to have kids in the trenches? Now that would be a change any
family can believe in."
That the president of D.C.'s Board of Education and a board
member counsel an incoming president to deprive his daughters of
a superior private school education in order to use them as a
"personal reality check" and "crash course" on the failures of No
Child Left Behind says all you need to know about the insanely
politicized character of D.C.'s public school system.
But the advice, while cruel, is perversely consistent with
liberalism's logic: sacrificing the immediate educational good
and opportunity of children for the sake of some ill-defined
greater political good defines the mindset of the National
Education Association. Don't let children leave public schools,
the attitude goes. Keep them in the trenches, lest people lose
confidence in the system and money and resources drain away. If
this means most children receive a crummy education, oh well; a
larger good has been achieved.
Moreover, since "equality" is defined by the NEA as sameness of
outcome, its proponents have to try and restrict opportunity
ruthlessly, as opportunity generates so many differences of
outcome. "Equality" and liberty can't coexist. Of course, those
who hold this ideology rarely subject their own children to it,
dropping them off at posh private schools before heading off to
make egalitarian-style arguments at NEA meetings.
While Bobb and Lord may want Obama's daughters in the "trenches,"
a growing number of public school teachers don't want their
children anywhere near them.
According to columnist
Clarence Page, "who reluctantly moved my own child to private
school after the fifth grade," public school teachers from big
cities are more likely to send their own children to private
schools than parents in the general population.
Citing a Thomas Fordham Institute study, he writes: "In Obama's
hometown, Chicago, for example, 38.7 percent of public school
teachers sent their children to private schools, the Fordham
study found, compared to 22.6 percent of the general public. In
Washington, D.C., 26.8 percent of public school teachers sent
their children to private schools, versus 19.8 percent of the
public."
These stats are worth remembering the next time the NEA cranks
out a report on the unsettling growth of homeschooling, charter
schools and private academies. Obama has served up plenty of this
propaganda himself, casting perfectly reasonable conservative
educational policies as a betrayal of the public school system.
But he sensibly if hypocritically exempts his children from these
stances.
From press reports it appears that Obama's daughters will be
spared the fate of Amy Carter. He already sends them to private
schools, and Michelle Obama took a look around the Georgetown Day
School this week, a private school known for its progressive
educational practices.
At the Georgetown Day School, its children of destiny take their
first steps toward an egalitarian society free of hierarchy and
distressing disparities by calling teachers by their first names,
and the students enjoy a curriculum heavy on "community service."
Tomorrow's social engineers, after all, have to be educated
somewhere, and the pampered egalitarians of the Democratic Party
certainly aren't going to expose their children to the "reality
check" of D.C.'s public schools.