The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

The Bigger the Better

Both sides love government. Herding cats -- to the right. uncle Sam buys you a car. Plus more.

(Page 2 of 4)

Where are these warriors? Save for a select few (such as Indiana’s own Rep. Mike Pence), Republicans head for the tall grass once the shooting starts. If I were an “undecided,” I’d at least know the Democrats thought they had something important to say. The Grand Old Party...the Party of Lincoln is cursed with too many who lack conviction.
-- Mike Dooley

MAKING SACRIFICES
Re: Eric Peters's The Sweet Stench of Failure:

One thing lost in the last act of Iphigenea at Detroit: The doleful effects of selective protectionism and fuel economy standards. Let's start with protectionism. Tariffs on imported trucks are at 25% and cars 2.5%. This, of course builds in a 25% profit margin head-start for trucks and solid business reasons for deemphasizing passenger cars as a business focus.

Meanwhile, fuel economy standards, in particular the Corporate Average Fuel Economy set up, enabled the auto makers to spread fuel economy goals over their entire product lines. The result: they could safely abandon fuel economy as a design goal for trucks so long as they could make enough small cars to balance the books. This alone probably kept the domestic makers in the car business and maintained a vestigial competence in fuel economy-focused engineering, but at a high price. They would continue to make high-mileage vehicles, but these cars would be cheap, nasty and seemingly designed to convince consumers that they really needed to trade up to a cushy high-profit, low-mileage truck or SUV to maintain any sense of self respect. The brand message, now reinforced for forty years running, is that anything that isn't a truck from Chrysler, Ford, or GM is junk and marks the driver as either uninformed, an AARP member of 15+ years standing, or a rental car customer.

Now it's 2008 and suddenly no one wants to buy gas-thirsty trucks, and gave up on Detroit cars years ago. As a taxpayer, I will now bend over and prepare for another reaming, but after a trillion dollars to save banks, corrupt debt rating agencies, and deadbeat borrowers, what's an extra $50 Billion among friends? One additional insult to injury. Now that New Dealers are going to quasi-nationalize the car companies, they will want a say in design and production issues. Make way for the sensible shoes on four wheels of every car-haters pathetically earthbound dreams.
-- Otto Nordpol

Democrats, use Soviet sales tactics: Compel car-buyers to purchase an American car with every foreign car they buy. (Unions, please make the American cars 100% recyclable.)
-- David Govett
Davis, California

 

PRAYING FOR FAILURE
Re: Jeffrey Lord's The New Adventures of Wonderboy:

Jeffrey Lord writes: "In fact, the only president other than Jimmy Carter (hmm) to come from an engineering background was, as Coolidge well knew, a champion of the idea of government intervention."

I'll take an engineer over a community-organizing lawyer any day. At least there is a chance, with an engineer, that he will understand how things work. And if a system is complex enough, say, those forces that determine the level of the seas, most engineers will lack the hubris required to jeopardize that system.

"Once past the warm glow of Inauguration Day, busily implementing policies that have a notable historical record of failure, Obama faces the same problem as Herbert Hoover. Which is to say that a failure to act correctly courts a curt dismissal as yet another failed president." 

Pray God that this statement is true for Obama, as it was for Hoover. It certainly wasn't vis-a-vis FDR.
-- Dan Martin
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Mr. Lord has hit another homerun in tagging Barack Obama as the new Herbert Hoover with the worst inclinations of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He is also right on target in suggesting Republicans should demand an investigation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That includes investigating the Obama’s chief of staff and his dear friend Franklin Delano Raines (McCain should have used this to tarnish Obama’s “economic” advantage) the man who along with Democrats Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Chuck Schumer and Barack Obama helped undercut the booming Bush/Republican economy in less than 2 years.
-- Michael Tomlinson
Habbaniyah, Iraq


LIQUIDITY EVERYWHERE, BUT NOT A DROP TO LEND
Re: Joseph Lawler's A Deflating Era:

Page:   12 3 4  

Letter to the Editor View all comments (8) | Leave a comment

frost| 11.12.08 @ 7:00AM

Poor Mr. Martell. Until some more sizable numbers join (my) Congressman Ron Paul or the so-called Constitution Party (where in the Constitution does it take on the multtiple subjects that this party takes on?), I'm afraid he's whistling-in-the-dark.
Hey, I agree that the Republicans are fish-bait; Bush is the worst president ever, tied with Jimmy Carter for ineptitude, stupidity and sheer nothingness...
But whata happens if Newt Gingrich takes over as (finally) a Kick-ass boss of the GOP? Could he do a Congress '94 thing?
This whole "party" thing is weird. Like, Libertarians aren't supposed to be involved with pushing people into an anti-abortion attitude as Bob Barr was, and I doubt if the Constitution covered it (or stem-cells and gay crap either).
If only Newt forgets about the presidency -- he's unelectable -- and rounds-up the herd, 'n directs 'em to the right, maybe the Republicans can do a Phoenix-thing and rebuild from the ashes... perhaps?

frost| 11.12.08 @ 7:11AM

Oh yeah -- and, M. Delphia Block's letter of yesterday did merit a reply, but it's awfully difficult trying to type when you're shaking your head in wonderment, wondering what planet she lives on...

Rocco| 11.12.08 @ 7:58AM

frost,

Amen to that!

mnotaro| 11.12.08 @ 12:20PM

In my opinion, Obama did not win the election...McCain did not lose...Bush lost. Obama was fighting against Bush the entire time and there was no way he could win against the liberal illuminati after the devastating economic turmoil that has been going on for the last 6 months...couple that with a weak, gimicky, impassionate campaign by McCain and the liberal MSM campaigning for Obama for the last 2 years...there was no way we could have won this battle.

back to basics| 11.12.08 @ 12:37PM

Paul Murtell is absolutely right. However, the possibility of sanity in our immigration policy will happen only inthe event of a severe national crisis. By then it may be to late to deport the illegal immigrants. So, it is likely we will never see this changes and America will break up. But in the meantime we must still try to accomplish this end. And we will need a lot of prayer too.

ruth| 11.12.08 @ 5:24PM

Paul Martell, you are a drama queen. I am not happy with President Bush either, but the last time I checked, none of our cities had been attacked by terroists, and for that fact I am very grateful. Say what you will about the President, but on the issue of national security he has been aces. Get over yourself.

Ms. Know| 11.15.08 @ 8:17PM

Big government is not a good idea, and it will fail. When will the socialist illuminati get that through their head.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/11/12/the-bigger-the-better
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT