Mr. Kurtz’s column in the Post is, like the various
“ombudsman” columns that have sprung up like mushrooms in the
newspapers of America, practically founded on the journalistic
trick of citing allegations of bias or malfeasance, beating the
columnar breast about it for a paragraph or two, asking if
objectivity and professionalism can be preserved or reestablished,
and concluding that—well, yes they can. Merely asking the question
thus becomes a means of reinforcing the self-satisfaction that
creates bias in the first place while simultaneously implying that
it doesn’t exist, except in trivial ways or by inadvertently going
“too far.”
Self-regard is no substitute for self-restraint or humility, and
neither Bowman’s diagnosis nor his brand of eviscerating clarity is
likely to be very popular with those who play such games. For
anyone seeking a deeper examination of the media- industrial
complex, however, Media Madness will likely be a
revelation. Indeed, it is a book that, especially if taken in
tandem with the superlative Honor, can in the space of a
few hours radically alter the way one understands the structure
(and frequent artifice) of the modern world.
Such is the incisiveness of this singular cultural critic,
although he would probably warn us not to take his or anyone else’s
word as the end-all decree on this or any other matter: “The word
‘reality’ as used by the media carries the same import as it does
in ‘reality TV,’ ” Bowman writes, “which is to say that, whatever
else it means, it cannot mean reality.”
Shawn Macomber is a contributing editor to The American
Spectator.