Romney and friends, one step further along. Bipartisanship at its finest. Roush's litany of abuses. Plus more.
(Page 2 of 3)
I wouldn't bet the farm on this information, but, if accurate,
the election may turn out much differently than predicted. Now if
only we can get voter fraud under control. Curiouser and
curiouser.
-- Michael Tobias
REACHING ACROSS THE AISLE...FOR HANDOUTS
Re: G. Tracy Mehan, III's
The Recriminations Begin:
Mr. Mehan writes: "One wonders what the Republican White House and Congress were thinking when they passed the new drug entitlement bill a few years back."
If my memory serves me the Speaker of the House was a pharmacist
and the Majority Leader of the Senate was a doctor...in the Age
of Abramoff, while, we now know, the "Friends of Angelo" (i.e.
Dems) were backing the truck up over at Fannie and Freddie.
Pondering it, to how much clearer an example of "bipartisanship"
can we point? Palin/Jindal 2012!
-- Reid Bogie
Waterbury, Connecticut
A MATTER OF DOCTRINE
Re: Mike Dooley's letter (under "Fact Checking Religion") in
Reader Mail's Under Attack:
Regarding Mike Dooley's letter of 27 October, "Under Attack," while the Creed of Nicaea-Constantinople (to give the full and accurate title) as recited in the various Western Churches includes the famous (or infamous) Filioque clause (the Holy Spirit "who proceeds from the Father and the Son), in fact, the original Greek text of the Creed merely states that the Holy Spirit is "the Lord and Giver of Light, who proceeds from the Father." This has been, of course, the major bone of contention between the Churches of the East and West since the 9th century.
In an effort to resolve the matter, the Pontifical Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity issued in 1996 a "Clarification on the Procession of the Holy Spirit," which begins by stating that the original, uninterpolated Greek text of the Creed is the only "universally binding ecumenical symbol of faith." It also points out that the Father alone is the "Archos Anarche," from whom the Son is begotten and the Spirit proceeds, while at the same time noting that the Holy Spirit is sent into the world by the action of the Son.
Underlining the point, both John Paul II and Benedict XVI use the Creed without the Filioque when writing ecumenical documents. As a Byzantine Catholic -- a member of an Eastern Catholic Church that follows Orthodox practices and beliefs while remaining in communion with the Church of Rome -- I have not used the Filioque in any liturgical service since the mid-1990s, precisely because it is the policy of the Church of Rome to respect the Tradition of each particular Church in the Catholic Communion.
Moreover, the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops is at the present time completing the process of eliminating the Filioque from vernacular celebration of the Mass of the Latin (Roman Catholic) Church, "in order to bring liturgical practice into line with doctrine." When the Filioque is finally suppressed throughout the Latin Church, the cause of Christian unity will receive a tremendous boost by bringing all the apostolic Churches of the world under the same Symbol of Faith.
It's interesting that the Episcopal Church, which has in general
walked away from all forms of Tradition in the last half century,
should be clinging tendentiously to the Filioque, a doctrinal
innovation of dubious theological import, at a time when it is
jettisoning most of the other core doctrines it carried away when
it broke from the Church of Rome back in the 16th century.
-- Stuart Koehl
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PRESENT?
Re: Jay Molyneaux's letter (under "Cradle to the Grave") in
Reader Mail's Under
Attack:
Let us take a look at Mr. Molyneaux's predictions for the future:
1. The detonation of a weapon of mass destruction in one or more of our larger cities. Could happen. This administration chose to waste $10 billion per month on a conventional war against people who did not attack us on 9/11, thus diverting attention from those who did. No matter the justifications given by this administration and its supporters, the fact remains we have wasted incredible resources on a conventional war when the people who attacked us are stateless terrorists capable of thinking outside the box. By misusing our security resources, this administration has left us insufficiently prepared for another attack within our borders.
2. The Dow could dip below 5000. Maybe. We can thank Al "ooops, I never dreamed this would happen" Greenspan, Phil "lets deregulate everything" Gramm and SEC chairman, Christopher "I never met a regulation I had any interest in enforcing" Cox for setting the stage for our current financial mess.
3. Social Security payments will be cut. Could happen. This must be a wet dream for right wingers -- the beginning of the end of Social Security.
Pumpkin| 10.28.08 @ 9:04AM
Sounds like Roush drank the Koolaid. Only mentions that EVERYTHINNG is that evil Bush and his administration. While I think that yes the Bush administration holds some responsibility for the housing crash because they did not daily scream about it from the rooftops, the Dems had their fingers all over this mess. The Democrats pushed the mortgages for those who could not afford them, pushed Fannie and Freddie (their personal campaign war chest and wealth generator) to buy and rebundle bad debt therefore encouraging more bad mortgages. Acorn demonstrated and intimidated banks into continuing this practice which spiraled out of control. All the while, Dodd and Frank said there was no problem and any criticism was Racist. All of our current economic woes can be traced directly back to efforts of Democrats and their corrupt allies pushing affordable housing. What a pile of crud. For Roush to blame the entire crisis on Bush is blatently ridiculously blinded by partisonship.
Joe Thaplumur| 10.28.08 @ 10:31AM
I like Palin and Jindal BUT Romney is showing the leadership that our party needs. He IS out there working very hard. Is his motivation his political future? Sure, but he agrees with conservative ideals...what’s wrong with that. There is no such thing as a Mother Theresa in politics. It looks like Romney is trying to build a network of loyalty and well as the beginnings of a ground force at a grass roots level. This is good. His ideas are new and conservative. This is what we want right? We want to rebuild the party. We want to tack the party back to the right a little. McCain tacked us too much to the left and as you all know, a Republican can't out lib a liberal. Lets stop the nit picking and get to work.
Tim O'Neill| 10.28.08 @ 12:46PM
JFK once said "Life isn't fair", further proof how far his Democrat party has strayed. When ABC News reporter Gibson asked Sen Obama why he'd raise the capital gains rate when it produces less revenue, the reply was that it's "fair". Sen. Obama calls the US Constitution flawed because it doesn't mandate fair wealth distribution. His foreign policy would do likewise on a global level. Today's Democrats are Fairness Doctrinaire.
d l wisz| 10.28.08 @ 9:24PM
The Prowler is right on.
The Romney's have a long history of personal interest over party unity. (better to be the leader of a party that loses than not be a leader in a winning party) Thanks in large part to Romney MI ended up with Granholm as AG then Gov.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/368gtpeb.asp?pg=1
Michigan-Matt| 10.29.08 @ 7:27AM
I don't know what kool aid d-l-wisz has been drinking, but as a Michigander and GOPer, Romney didn't "give us" Gov Granholm... that claim is pure fabric, mirrors and smoke.
Granholm won Michigan because she ran against a tired, worn-out, ineffective GOP campaign structure Posthumus inherited and embraced from former Gov Engler. She won because, as a Democrat, she ran to the center and right of her Party and appealed to independents, swing voters and moderate GOPers who had been shut out of GOP politics for 12 yrs by the social conservatives inside the Party. She ran a great, near flawless campaign.
No Romney caused Granholm to be elected --that claim rests with a tired political machine Engler turned over to Dick Posthumus and he wasted... over and over.