The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
The Public Policy
Print Email
Text Size

The Public Policy

Jagged Little Pills

The presidential candidates finally realize that reimporting prescription drugs is bad medicine.

Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama both declared recently that they'd rethink their support for foreign drug importation, largely because of repeated scares about contaminated drug supplies.

That's an encouraging development. The U.S. currently bans bulk drug imports, but if that ban were lifted, millions of unsuspecting patients could find themselves with dangerous counterfeit drugs in their medicine cabinets.

There is plenty of evidence that counterfeit drugs are a serious problem in the global market. For example, Belgian officials recently seized more than two million fake painkillers and anti-malarial pills being shipped to Africa from India. It was the largest counterfeit drug raid in European history. Disturbingly, the counterfeits almost slipped through, as inspectors decided to test the drugs only after noticing spelling mistakes on the labels.

"Thanks to this seizure, we have saved lives," said Lieven Muylaert, spokesman for Belgium's customs department.

That's no exaggeration. According to Oxford's Centre for Tropical Medicine, the trace amounts of anti-malarial ingredients contained in fake drugs like those seized can cause the malaria parasite to develop immunity to genuine doses and make it more difficult for patients to recover.

The events in Belgium should give pause to American lawmakers pushing to legalize foreign drug importation. Clearly counterfeit drug makers have grown adept at circumventing regulators. If bulk imports were allowed, these drugs could easily have made their way to the U.S. market.

Currently, pharmaceutical companies are required to protect the supply chain for the drugs they produce, starting with the manufacturing plant, through the distribution channels, and on to pharmacists, physicians, and patients in the United States.

If European and Canadian suppliers could introduce other drugs into the U.S. supply chain, it would be impossible to tell if the medicine came from a FDA-inspected facility or from an unsanitary plant in Bangladesh.

These concerns are real. The World Health Organization estimates that 10 percent of today's global medicine supply is counterfeit. If importation were legal, drugs like those seized in Belgium could easily put U.S. consumers at risk.

Importation is made even more dangerous by the European Union's system of "parallel trade," wherein pharmaceuticals pass freely among EU nations. This allows multiple opportunities for counterfeits to infiltrate the supply chain. A drug sold in Britain could have been produced in China or India and shipped through Belgium, Latvia, or Cyprus.

It's refreshing to see the presidential candidates reconsider their stances on importation in light of the mounting evidence of its dangers. Let's hope they and other legislators continue to put Americans' safety first by standing against the dangers of foreign drug importation.

topics:
Election 2008, Health Care, John McCain, Barack Obama

About the Author

Grace-Marie Turner is president of the Galen Institute and a co-author of Why ObamaCare Is Wrong for America (Broadside/HarperCollins, 2011).

Letter to the Editor View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Susan Robinson| 10.29.08 @ 10:19AM

I, like you, thought that our drugs are safe. However, that is not the case because the FDA is woefully underfunded. According to the FDA, “We literally have no control over bulk drugs that enter the U.S. Counterfeit Drugs,” Rx for Danger, CBS News, 07/03/2007. There are 700 plants in China producing drugs or components for the US and the FDA will get around to inspecting them in 40 to 50 years at the rate they are going. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/15/washington/15fda.html

Actually, because of the high cost of drugs in the US, it is likely that we are a target for counterfeit drugs. Counterfeiters don't care who they kill, they just want to make money, and they can make more if they distribute in high cost markets.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Grace-Marie Turner

More Articles From The Public Policy

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/28/jagged-little-pills

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 12:48PM

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 10:35AM

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT