McCain's play for PA. Tyrrell slams the media monkeys. This is getting creepy. Plus more.
(Page 2 of 3)
"…Expect a crisis within six months should Obama win, promises Joe Biden. Perhaps he is right, but the first one is more likely to be domestic than international. …"
Excellent commentary. I have been telling folks this now for months that the 1st 2 years of an Obama presidency will be the most dangerous. Actually the first 1 ½ years as the 2010 election will be then. The Democrats always, always overreach and this will be no exception. It could be a gun ban or some late night (and hidden) new tax, could be something in their universal health care proposal, or it could just come down to a weak economy. The first real test will be if they hold the house and/or senate in 2010. It really rests with Obama and how he is perceived. Weak like Carter in a dangerous world? He’s toast. Strong like Reagan? Not toast.
The trouble is that a whole swath of the main stream media is 100% in the tank for Obama so we will not get any truthfulness out of them.
I have a gut feeling that the Obama administration will be one wracked with scandal. I don’t know why I feel that way, maybe it’s the ACORN guys, maybe it’s the weirdoes Obama surrounds himself with.
The other feeling I get is that Obama is not stupid and he knows as W did that he will have to fight radical Islam. If he does (and he will have to or cease to have a 2nd term) he will totally piss off his base who want 100% surrender. So it could be that the left turns on him, that his biggest critics come FROM the left and not the right. Can you imagine? For instance, what if the US armed forces experiences a large drop in reenlistments while fighting terror? And what if Obama proposed and Congress puts in the draft? Can you imagine?
Anyway, that’s my take. Great article.
-- Michael H. Serafin
Hooksett, New Hamsphire
POUPON POWELL
Re: Jeffrey Lord's
What Do You Do With a General?
Kudos once again to Mr. Lord for stating eloquently what we all
know to be true. General Powell rose to those stars via political
maneuvering and NOT work ethic. A good friend of mine who is a
genuine hero (Former general at Delta force) tells me that any
star above two is purely political. Perhaps General Powell wants
that second term as Secretary of State, so that when President
Bush and Generals Petraeus and Odierno win the war, he can claim
credit for it. That seems like the most obvious scenario, given
that Powell is the quintessential political animal. His current
lifestyle, as I understand it is to demand very high speech fees,
upfront, and to fly only in private jets. Not bad for a retired
"public servant." It appears, as Rush has stated to be purely
racist in nature. Why else would he endorse someone of basically
no experience in any venue (other than the great success of the
nefarious Acorn!)
-- Robert Mandraccia, MD
Ft Myers, Florida
Brilliant article by Jeffrey Lord:
"OK with the idea that this mindset of Obama's will be running say, the U.S. Department of Justice?"
Obama has already been filing criminal charges against people who have spoken out against him...Imagine him with all the resources of the DOJ to use against his critics.
This is why I think the American people will not elect Mr.
Obama.
-- C. Baker
Ft.Worth, Texas
SO DO YOU
Re: Peter Ferrara's Voter
Fraud:
Conveniently, your editorial fails to mention a recent book, Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, by Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of media studies at NYU. Miller's work has carefully documented widespread efforts within the Republican Party to thwart election results, voter turnout and voter eligibility by both legal and illegal means. While I do not doubt that problems exist throughout the dual party machine, it is at best negligent and at worst deceptive for you to demonize Democrats while pretending that volumes of research (which, unlike the work of many who work for corporate-sponsored "Institutes" like your own, actually circulates in a universe of juried peers) has not documented a sinister effort by some on the right to compromise our Democracy.
So let's be honest, especially when we're writing about election honesty. Let's not pretend that the highly partisan Heritage Foundation is a credible source for anything. Let's not pretend that you haven't been paid in the past by lobbyists or by foundations run with corporate dollars to write spin masking as undisputed truth.
Robert| 10.24.08 @ 9:54AM
Heather and all concerned others, read all about it here:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78931
burt| 10.24.08 @ 9:56AM
Most Pennsylvanians are fairly conservative, but the state has been rules by voter fraud in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh for a long, long time.
Obama should carry the state fairly thanks to crooks such as "fast eddy".
Dave Smith| 10.24.08 @ 3:27PM
First, a big thank you to AS for the comment engines you use. They are easy and responsive.
BO gets traction because Americans, a forward-looking bunch, have short memories. All too often the country dabbles with a President-D and then sobers up on serious issues and elects President-R. Combine the general amnesia with already well-described BO cheerleaders disguised as journalists and reporters and you obtain the current situation. When John McCain, with SP, overcomes this he'll go down as the penultimate Comeback Kid.
Diane Smith| 10.25.08 @ 11:52AM
Thanks, Dan Martin for the nomination. I went back to see what profundity I might have stumbled upon. Sounded like the typical wing-flapping of a gadfly to me. Gadfly, for those born after dictionaries went into disuse, is either 1. an insect that bites livestock or 2. one who annoys others, esp. by rousing them from complacency. It is a point of extreme rancor with me that "volunteers' will invade nursing homes to "assist" the elderly in exercising their right to vote, when that old person has long since lost the ability to think rationally. The ones who can still marshall enough brain cells to have an independent political thought don't need some ACORN rep of chicken thief mentality to assist them. I have friends in their eighties; one or two in their nineties. Some still possess the mental acuity, if not the desire to stay informed. But time and over-medication have altered their thought processes to a point beyond what is required to judge the political intention of a candidate, the direction this country will take, should he be elected. It is a sad fact of life, that a segment of the population, once more serious, have narrowed their concerns to Social Security and Medicare. I consider it voter fraud every bit as criminal as Freddie Johnson registering 73 times. A kind of mugging of the helpless elderly.
Diane Smith