Michael Crichton called it the "Odd Man Hypothesis." A fictional
theory that played a big role in his novel The Andromeda
Strain, the hypothesis was that only an unmarried man, a man
with nobody else to think of and thus nothing to lose, could be
trusted to have clear decision-making capacity in a time of
nuclear or biological crisis.
I read the novel years ago. I remembered the hypothesis as being
a bit more all-encompassing -- that while it originally applied
to an unmarried man, it would by extension apply to any
noncomformist, anybody with a particularly strong will and a
strong insistence on thinking and acting for himself.
In short, it would apply to anyone who would show, in Alfred,
Lord Tennyson's words, "some civic manhood, firm against the
crowd."
That slightly exaggerated impression also applied the theory not
just to decision-making but also to an ability to overcome
obstacles and physical pain: I remembered Crichton's hero, a Dr.
Hall, crawling up through a safety compartment with darts
sticking him all over his body, darts filled with a substance
that should have felled him before he reached the target station
where his key could turn the lock that stopped the explosion that
destroyed the world -- or something like that. And of course Hall
did find the will to crawl the extra few feet and turn the
salvific key before passing out.
All of which explains why I thought, until I re-researched it,
that the Odd Man Hypothesis might apply to these last weeks of
the presidential campaign. Hell, since I like my version of the
Odd Many Hypothesis better than Crichton's version, I'll apply it
anyway: The Odd Man, described by Crichton as often "irritable,"
the confirmed noncomformist, the man who will not be held back by
sheer consistency (and in my version, often not by logic either),
is the only man who can defy gravity, overcome the darts, and by
sheer force of will find a way to unlock the Electoral College
for the right-leaning party despite all the odds (and his own
mistakes) operating against him.
The way I had remembered the Odd Man Hypothesis, it quite clearly
might apply to John McCain. Set aside the notion that he is, in
many ways, truly odd in the sense of having odd reactions to
ordinary events and odd fits of pique when no pique is merited.
He is "Odd" in my "Hypothesis" sense because he thinks so
differently and acts so differently and reacts so differently
from the norm, while staying alive through sheer cussedness, that
only a fool would ever completely count him out.
Using a different image, National Review's Rich Lowry a
few weeks back described McCain as the cartoon character who had
run off a cliff but who was churning his legs so hard and
flapping his arms so rapidly that he just wouldn't fall, not for
the longest time, even though he was churning nothing but air at
about 2,000 feet. But even the Lowry/Road Runner-like cartoon
character eventually does fall, with all the appropriate sound
effects; yet the Odd Man, in contrast, somehow finds a way to
hold on and triumph for his cause, whatever that cause may be.
JOHN McCAIN is an SOB. He has fits of rage for no good reason. He
takes umbrage for no good reason. He holds grudges for no good
reason. He creates scapegoats for no good reason. He picks fights
for no good reason. He plays everything by gut instinct and
appears never to do long-term planning…yes, for no good reason.
And sometimes he completely breaks. And yet… and yet, the man
ain't dead. He has run the worst Republican presidential campaign
since 1964 -- far worse than Bob Dole's oddly valiant effort, and
even worse than the pathetic 1992 race of the elder Bush -- and
yet he actually still has a chance, with less than three weeks to
go, if only he can gain some traction.
Over already? Hell, no. When Ronald Reagan debated Jimmy Carter
one week before the 1980 Election Day, the two men were
essentially tied in the polls. Reagan won by 10 points, and
garnered 489 electoral votes to Carter's 49. Repeat that: ten
points in just one week. John McCain has three weeks. And he has
an opponent who has shown a bizarre and extremely disturbing
pattern of consorting with radicals and crooks. Yes, a pattern --
a pattern of bad judgment, of associating with bad characters, of
playing the bad old political games, of voting for the most
leftist legislation, and a pattern of saying things that show
disdain for Americans who don't breathe his rarified leftist air.
It's a pattern that could and should still scare off voters in
droves.
And John McCain is running at a time when an extraordinarily
jumpy economy has people on edge. People on edge can jump either
way. Right now they are jumping toward Obama's "cool" as opposed
to McCain's mercurial intensity. But three weeks from now, with
who-knows-what other unforeseen events in these most unsettling
of times, the voters could just as easily jump away from Obama's
unknowns and towards the crusty familiarity of McCain. Anything
could happen.
But if anything good -- meaning anything conducive to a
government not utterly dominated by leftists and which does not
appoint leftists as federal judges -- is to happen, then John
McCain himself, flying solo as only the Odd Man can, is going to
need to be the one who makes it happen. And tonight's debate
might be his last chance, because only with an audience big
enough to see "it" happen can whatever happens make a big enough
difference in the race.
SOMEHOW, SOME COMPLETELY unexpected way, McCain must rattle Obama
tonight. The two men will, I understand, be sitting at the same
table with moderator Bob Schieffer. Without losing his own cool
or his sense of humor, McCain must find a way to puncture Obama's
air of placid command. Maybe it might involve some subtle
violation of Obama's physical space. Maybe it might involve a
heretofore unknown Obama sore spot. Maybe it might be a word or
phrase Obama can't stand. Maybe it will be an argument that Obama
has no answer for. Whatever it is, it must rattle Obama, must
rattle him badly. It must show the American people that Obama
can't be trusted, or believed, or admired.
McCain, meanwhile, must find a way to reassure Americans that he
himself can be trusted. The Navy man must offer a safe port in a
storm. Last week I outlined in a blog post
how I would advise McCain to talk about the economy. Or, if he
wants a different tack, I've twicesuggested
a proposal that can shake up the race by in one fell swoop
offering to reverse the outsourcing of jobs, protect pension
plans and retirement accounts, and bring the single biggest
lobbying reform to Washington, ever.
It will be a neat trick to rattle Obama while simultaneously
either reassuring Americans or exciting them about a new
proposal. But it's the only hope left for John McCain. And McCain
is just the cussed, unconventional, willful, irritable, Odd Man
to pull it off.
McCain should follow Reagan's lead. "What would Reagan Say" -
when confronted by Obama on negative ads, Reagan would have said,
"It's not my fault there's nothing positive about your character
to report" or something like that. McCain doesn't know how to do
these simple things and that's where he is failing to connect
with the American voters. Since we're all used to "soundbites"
it's the good ones that we wake up to. Someone tell McCain.
jacqueline Zaring| 10.18.08 @ 7:55AM
McCain should follow Reagan's lead. "What would Reagan Say" - when confronted by Obama on negative ads, Reagan would have said, "It's not my fault there's nothing positive about your character to report" or something like that. McCain doesn't know how to do these simple things and that's where he is failing to connect with the American voters. Since we're all used to "soundbites" it's the good ones that we wake up to. Someone tell McCain.
tiffany jewelery| 4.9.10 @ 2:40AM
dsf