Eminentoes
The Greeening of Thomas Friedman
He’s trying hard to save the Earth, but he doesn’t much know what he’s talking about.
(Page 3 of 3)
p>
SO DOES NUCLEAR enter Friedman’s field of vision? Tolerant fellow
that he is, Friedman is not ready to condemn nuclear to outer
darkness. He even mentions it once or twice as a “clean
alternative,” although with no visible enthusiasm.
br>
/p>
To build a new nuclear plant costs a minimum of $7 billion today, and would take probably eight years from conception to completion. Most CEOs have about eight years in office, and there are not a lot of utility CEOs who would bet $7 million — which might be more than half the company’s market cap — on one nuclear project.br> Nevertheless, there are now more than a dozen license applications for new reactors before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Whether or not these proposals go anywhere will depend entirely on whether the general public achieves a better understanding of the technology. Concerned as he is with petrodictators, global warming, and world energy shortages, you’d think Friedman would spend more of his own time learning how “abundant, clean, reliable and cheap” nuclear technology can be.
Letter to the Editor View all comments (4) | Leave a comment
Related Articles
More Articles by William Tucker
More Articles From Eminentoes
http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/06/the-greeening-of-thomas-friedm
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- The Continuing Crisis
- Ailes: A Voice for the Silent Majority
- Inside the Gates of Eden
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
H/T to National Review Online
ADVERTISEMENT
Mort| 1.26.09 @ 10:56PM
http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/06/the-greeening-of-thomas-friedm
Mr. Tucker -
Your condemnation of green, clean, and renewable energies may sound good for a short-term perspective, but you're missing the point. The energy revolution has to be the next big one. If we don't have an administration that gets serious about this, we're going to continue to wallow in greed and short-term profit objectives. We haven't put the incentives in place to attract adequate resources ($ and innovation) to be devoted to making clean, green, and renewable energies work on a large scale, and I'm including nuclear in this. The two minor details that you fail to address in you comments about nuclear energy are what do we do with the waste and how do we prevent terrorists from targeting these plants or stealing the energy for weapons. Your IQ doesn't have to be much higher than 70 to realize that our current energy model is inadvertently impoverishing us and the rest of the world. I'm not sure why you would want to fight an administration that wants to seriously encourage investments and innovations in these areas. Maybe we should wait for China or India to leapfrog us in these areas, while we maximize the ROI on our fossil-fuel based energy model.