9.24.08 @ 12:01AM
I’LL GLADLY PAY YOU TUESDAY…
Re: Philip Klein’s Paulson’s Instant Gratification:
In the midst of the debate, “Paulson’s Instant Gratification” is
the best and most accurate explanation of what’s going on. Many
thanks for the article, and I hope it is read far and wide.
— Lydia Brownback
I doubt anyone will address this outrage any better than Philip Klein has done in this article. The selfish, self-centered, reckless, irresponsible and hypocritical attitudes and policies of baby-boomer liberals are now manifesting themselves in this particular crisis, the Social Security entitlement mess and others. Ever since these spoiled brats screamed and pouted their way to power starting in the 1960s they have been rigging things so they can take, take, take. Now, those in the next generation(s) who work for a living are going to once again pay for their social experiments while they feel none of the pain because, like Social Security, they will be sure to prop things up with our money just long enough for them to take what’s “theirs” while they laugh behind the backs of the rubes like me who don’t have the power to stop them.
At one basic level conservatism is about first behaving
responsibly as an individual, then taking personal responsibility
for your actions and decisions, and dare I say it, having due
regard for how your actions and decisions may affect others and our
nation/community at large. If I wasn’t so angry about this mountain
of cash we are about to throw into the money burning furnace that
is the federal government I’d be weeping over how selfishness,
instant gratification and irresponsibility seem to have become the
norm under the “leadership” of these people.
Your Mr. Klein blames the culture of instant gratification, easy
money policy of the Federal Government, and the greed of Wall
Street for the collapse of the housing boom. He forgot to mention
the law, sponsored by Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank (both
of them strong socialists), which under Clinton threatened jail to
banks refusing to lend mortgage money to the poor and the welfare
recipients under “redlining” practices. So the bank complied — no
more earnings criteria, no more 10-20% down payment, no more
“redlining.” Shouldn’t Dodd and Frank resign in shame for another
failed socialist scheme? We want more details about that 1999 law
(I think it was 1999) and how exactly was it pushed through
Congress. Can you put somebody to task to dig out the details?
— Marc Jeric
Las Vegas, Nevada
All the pundits, and all the talking heads and politicians from the chattering class, seem to throw this “$700 billion” around with wild abandon. Where did they come up with that figure?
When I crunched the numbers, the par value of all “bad” mortgages (whether sub-prime or not) came in at less than $250 billion. What does Paulson & Co want to do with the other $450 billion?
I agree with those who say “let the free market settle the issue.” If that means AIG, Lehman, Goldman, Bear, and Morgan go out of business, so be it. Freddy and Fannie should be tossed into the ash heap of history. So far, the only post-“mess” transaction in the last 2-3 weeks that has met any constitutional muster is when Merrill Lynch was bought out by Bank of America.
By any measure, the Federal Government has overstepped its
limited authority, as set in place by the founding fathers in that
most famous of all documents. Both the administration and Congress
should be ashamed of themselves.
— Owen H. Carneal, Jr.
Philip Klein’s analysis of America’s gratification binge is correct until it gets to the bashing of Paulson’s bailout. Paulson has no other choice in the short run if we are to avoid complete economic collapse. Does Mr. Klein want 10 new years of Great Depression? Neither does Paulson. But that is what we may get if Congressional Democrats and the Republican Mike Pences continue to throw sand in the gears. Paulson has a world economy to save. We all must soon enough deal with our 50-year binge, but Paulson knows that instant action is first required to save the USA and the world from immediate economic ruin.
As Milton Friedman and Ben Bernanke have stated: The Great
Depression could have been averted had the US Treasury and the
Federal Reserve sought and Congress had agreed in 1930 and after to
fund failed banks or their depositors — and thereafter had kept
the money supply growing at a prudent rate. President Hoover would
most likely have served a pleasant second term without anyone ever
needing or hearing of a New Deal. Instead, the US Treasury took a
tough love approach and closed failed bank after failed bank,
leaving their depositors penniless. Even worse, the Fed and
Treasury allowed the money supply to contract to the point that its
size in 1934 was one-half the size it had in October 1929, insuring
five more years of national poverty. We should thank God for
Paulson and Bernanke — rather than second-guess them. It was not
they who created the current meltdown.
— Darrel Hansen
WHAT CURRICULUM IS THAT?
Re: Ralph R. Reiland’s Obama World Flunks Economics 101:
Pondering the NYT’s “government-is-good-markets-are-bad
ideology” prompts me to recall that the NYT thought the
Soviet government was good.
— Reid Bogie
I can’t help but wonder if, and how much, George Soros is involved in the current financial crisis. After all, he was the man who “broke the Bank of England” in 1992, forcing the Conservative government of the day to withdraw the pound from the European Exchange Rates Mechanism, which ended up costing the UK some Â£3.4 billion, and dealt the British economy a severe blow. Soros made $1 billion on the deal.
Soros has made no secret of the fact he wants Obama to be
elected, and he would do just about anything to see that happens.
To that end, he certainly has the wherewithal and the knowledge to
have engineered the current financial crisis, knowing that a crash
if the US economy would be to Obama’s advantage. (I’m not saying he
did engineer the current mess, but, then again, such monkeyshines
are not totally out of the realm of possibility.)
— Gretchen L. Chellson
As a former corporate CEO and die-hard capitalist it pains me to see one of ours, and a professor non-the-less, make a stupid statement: “the top 1 percent of taxpayers earned 22 percent of total adjusted gross income and paid 40 percent of all federal income taxes.” I know, I know, per the latest release of the IRS data etc., etc. etc.
No argument from me that the upper 1 percent and upper 25 percent of American wage earners pay more, much, much more, than their fair share of taxes. To say that the remaining American’s do not pay federal income tax is a lot like denying that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west (the earth rotates around the sun of course, not vice-versa.) In both cases you are technically correct but not in the sense of what either means to normal, human beings.
The bottom 75% of Americans do pay taxes and a very significant amount of the tax burden. For example, while the so called ‘social security tax’ goes into a ‘trust fund’ it really is just a federal income tax not much different from the taxes you are talking about. Furthermore, for all practical purposes, corporate taxes flow to the consumer through either prices, or changes in quality and/or quantity of a good or service. If it where otherwise the corporation would eventually go out of business and new corporations would not be formed.
Please for your own sake Prof. Reiland, readjust your numbers
and rhetoric to reflect the real picture so you don’t come across
as a foolish Rush Limbaugh by parsing the meaning of federal
— Rick Pragluski
Ralph R. Reiland replies:
You’re right, regarding the non-rich paying taxes other than income taxes. Like on cigarettes and alcohol — the poor smoke more and the tax itself is regressive, i.e., a rich smoker making 100 times more than a poor smoker doesn’t smoke 100 times more packs per day. But I focused solely on the income tax because the campaign news is currently focused on raising the marginal income tax rates at the top, not focused on beer taxes, etc..
Thanks for replying.
Re: Jeffrey Lord’s When Will Biden Pony Up?:
Jolting Joe is to be congratulated on his generosity. As he said, when he was growing up his Catholic system of values inculcated in him made him believe that “we have to give up some of what we have to help those with less,” or words to that effect.
We see from this essay that Bombastic Joe gives the almost incredible sum of $995.00 a year to charity! If you haven’t done the math — that’s about .00311% of his income. It is interesting…
Joe says we must have higher taxes so we can give that to the poor. That’s patriotic (I see it as an “otic” but idiotic.) says America’s last Always Angry Man. I come from Angry Joe’s religious denomination and nowhere in my theology is written or spoken so far as I know that we are to give money to the government to distribute to the poor. It says, Oh Vituperative One, that we are to give of ourselves — time and treasure — to lift the poor. No middle man, just thee and me. And Jeering Joe, I took in one-third of what you did and gave to charity six times what you did in actual American dollars.
This lack of service and charity is the hallmark of Democrats. They serve the country only in ways that enrich them. Sacrificial service is not something they embrace. I recall Donna Shalala’s exultant cry of relief: “Thankfully we did not send our best and brightest to Vietnam.”
Sad to think they once again might be running the entire
government. Time to start digging: bury your money, guns, and
bibles. Democrats are back in town.
— Jay Molyneaux
Denver, North Carolina
I was appalled to hear Joe Biden, Obama’s VP, in Ohio say that he supports clean coal for China, but not for the United States.
“No coal plants here in America,” he said. “Build them, if they’re going to build them, over there. Make them clean.”
“We’re not supporting clean coal,” he said of himself and Obama.
My father is a coal miner, my grand father was a coal miner, my great grand father was a coal miner. What is wrong with the Democrat party today? I’m voting straight Republican this year. Obama/Biden disgusts me.
Here is the link to the Youtube video.
— Fred Newbrough
Jeffrey Lord complains that Joe and Jill Biden paid only $66,273 in federal income taxes. The outrage is that Joe Biden has publicly called into question the patriotism of Rep. Charles Rangel, who, apparently, did not pay taxes on all of his income.
Doesn’t he know that Rangel is a Korean War veteran?
Doesn’t he know that Rangel is an African-American?
How DARE he challenge Rangel’s patriotism!
— Dan Martin
Re: The Prowler’s Democratic Delay Game:
So the Prowler reveals that Democrat legislative aides have conceded a delay in passing a $700 billion or more bailout will help the Obama campaign. That begs the question, why delay only until Tuesday or Thursday? Why not delay by whatever means possible its passing until November 4th. That will simply destroy McCain/Palin and the Republicans. Such delay would effect an unambiguous ambush of the election, assuring an Obama win.
The Dems know — as it was dramatically demonstrated by Monday’s 300+ point dive — that the stock market abhors uncertainty. An impasse of this magnitude and consequence will have a consequent effect on McCain’s poll numbers. The incumbent party will always be linked with the economy into an election. We are watching the October surprise unfold in slow motion. The Dems merely need to delay passage of the bailout until Nov 4th! The market will have crashed by then and Obama’s election will be a certainty. Even some Republicans like Richard Shelby are playing into this suicidal scheme, clueless to what’s really going on here.
Sunday House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “Democrats will act responsibly to insulate Main Street from Wall Street.” What she REALLY is saying is, “Democrats will act in any way necessary to insulate Obama from defeat.” She has crafted the perfect storm to achieve this end. She and her cabal like Bernie Frank, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer and Richard Durbin and their Democrat predecessors with their compliant media lapdogs, are bringing off the supreme hat trick: in one fell swoop covering their role in creating this crisis by having passed the Community Reinvestment Act in 1977, abolishing redlining and coercing banks to make loans to people incapable of repaying them. Instead of reaping blame and shame for this sham legislation, they are turning it to their candidate’s favor, using the CRA’s destruction of prudent lending practices by banks to create the crisis whose solution is the socialization of banking in the US on their opponent’s watch. Easy then to link the crisis to McCain. Ergo, Obama wins the election.
This is their strategy, and — because they control Congress —
there isn’t a damn thing the Republicans nor McCain can do about
it. Unless, that is, this shameful scheme is exposed for what it is
NOW! There still is time to reveal this monstrous coup d’etat in
— Robert Deutsch
Robert McCain repeatedly makes the claim that the media has attacked Sarah Palin unfairly, yet doesn’t provide any specific examples of this. As far as I can tell, the media has accurately reported numerous facts about her political career, such as her support for millions of dollars of earmarks including the Bridge to Nowhere, her commitment to taking away a woman’s right to choose an abortion even in the case of rape and incest, and various political intrigues including Troopergate.
Reporting factual information about all the candidates is what I
expect from the media. And the media cannot be blamed if these
facts cast some candidates in a more favorable light than others.
Mr. McCain needs to quit whining.
— Kenneth Utting
From the Ranarian Republic, Gabriel Sabbagh croaked this query — “Who traded an unattractive wife against a rodeo beauty with a lot of money?” — then mused: “Presumably “the other” McCain is not the right man to author a book on these flaws of the Republican Party.”
Perhaps he could do one on Union pour Mouvement Populaire? Let’s see, now…Nicolas Sarkozy traded an unattractive wife against a statuesque Schiaparelli model, dumped her (after being publicly cuckolded), and ushered into Palais d’Elysee a sultry singer/songwriter whose background includes being a peek-a-boo model and having serial affairs with sundry celebrities, some of whom were married.
There’s a delightful French phrase maisons de verre. It
seems appropriate, no?
— David Gonzalez
I SAY, MY DEAR FELLOW
Re: Rob Johnston’s letter (under “Finding Scotland”) in Reader Mail’s Panic City:
I lived in London for four years and traveled often to Scotland for business and pleasure. The English were out of joint about the results of devolution that resulted in Members of Parliament from Scotland voting on internal matters in England. One of the most controversial issues was Scottish votes regarding the English National Health System while not having any political accountability for these votes as Scotland had a separate National Health System that provided much better coverage than the English NHS. It was so much better that Brits who lived in England near the Scottish border would register for NHS in Scotland rather than in England. While these complaints were certainly made in England, they were occasional. I heard much more vitriol in England against the United States (and France) than against Scotland.
When I drove to Scotland, once I changed the radio station from
BBC 2 to BBC Scotland, the Anti-English vitriol seemed to dominate
the radio waves. England was the source of all the Scottish ills. I
was surprised by sectarianism in Glasgow, but you certainly never
heard anyone on radio or in the newspapers promoting it, while you
did hear talk of Scottish succession in polite society. I have
Catholic and Protestant friends in Scotland who have a common
hatred of England.
— Don Parnell
HILLYER’S RYDER RECORD
Re: Quin Hillyer’s Easy Ryder:
When I first read your piece on Friday, I thought you delusional
if not insane. This Sunday evening I think you insightful if not
prescient. Please tell me McCain and the White Sox will take it all
— Spike Herbert
Taxes, Trade, Joe Biden, Sarah Palin, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Ben Bernanke, Economics, Business, Earmarks, Social Security, Abortion, Constitution, Law, Founding Fathers, Africa, Conservatism, Oil
Sign up for our weekly newsletter:
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
By John Corry
By Mark Steyn
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
By Mark Steyn
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
By Brit Hume
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.