(Page 2 of 2)
Sarah Palin probably would not have told top Israeli officials, as reported in the Israeli press, that Israel would just have to learn to live with a nuclear-armed Iran.
Sarah Palin probably would not have assumed that the answer to failed diplomatic negotiations with Iran was more diplomatic negotiations with Iran.
The word "probably" must be used because we can only speculate on the basis of her barracuda-like instincts.
But there is one thing of which we can be sure: If Sarah Palin had been in the Senate in 1973, she would not have been one of the five Senators opposing the Alaska Pipeline Bill.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
victor| 2.15.10 @ 9:22AM
And they said that Sarah had or hasn't any Foreign Policy experience.
Let's see what the Obama's and Biden's have, shall we?
She has a full house compared to a pair and nothing.
Neither Obama nor Biden have ever managed or negotiated anything besides what to where to go and what to get for dinner!