“So what do you think of the election so far?” my friend Brian asked me. This was back in March, when the Republicans had settled on McCain but the Democrats were still undecided. All American discussion, Brian behind the counter of his neighborhood hardware store, me out front using the copying machine.
“I think McCain beats Hillary, but Obama beats McCain,” I said. “If Obama’s elected, Congress will eat him alive.”
Shows you how much I knew.
Another parallel experience: I’ve been printing out my columns and putting them in a binder for my boys. Way at the back end of my archive, I found “The Essential Bush,” which I printed on this site on April 8 of 2002. Boy, did I know a lot back then.p>Here’s the nut graf: br> /p>
Republican and Democrat operatives alike looked at the famous USA Today red-and-blue map of Election 2000, and in it they read the lineaments of political doom. Democrats saw Texas and Florida governed by Bushes, and knew they could not control the country with just California, New York, and the Volvo states — the rest of the map was hopeless. Republicans saw that, if Democrats buried Texas and Florida the way they had flooded California — primarily via Hispanic immigration — the GOP would be reduced to permanent minority status, and the federal system would effectively come to an end, as the country was ruled by the seaboard elites.br> I was right, too, but you can see what “right” gets you. Things didn’t work out that way. Why not? George W. Bush and Karl Rove apparently thought they could wipe out Democrats altogether as an electoral force. Some Democrats appear to contemplate the same thing in reverse now. What’s the lesson? That the U.S. appears to be good for a fight, almost no matter what the defects of one party or the other.
TAKE THIS ELECTION, FOR EXAMPLE. For a while, it was supposed to be a Hillary coronation. Then it looked like it might be an Obama coronation. Both stumbled on their way to the crown.
(N.B. There is no such verb as “to coronate.” “Coronation” is the nominative form of “to crown.”)
Democrats have correctly observed that the Republican act has grown old. It didn’t grow old with Ronald Reagan, but it has with Bush and the sloppy, self-dealing Republicans in Congress these days. The GOP act has grown so stale that the party ended up nominating John McCain, the Senator the New Republic’s Jonathan Chait described as (during Bush’s first term) “the most effective advocate of the Democratic agenda in Washington.”
REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE “HOLD YOUR NOSE” ELECTIONS BEFORE. This one’ll take the Pepe LePew.
But two or three things have played out John McCain’s way. First, the McCain campaign has proved a total surprise with both its nimbleness and its willingness to go for the throat. The McCainiacs jab, they counterpunch, they float like a butterfly and sting like a bee. They’ve got Obama completely off his footing, indeed, seem to be able to make him do what they want him to do. Arguably, the GOP’s advertising made Obama deliver a different acceptance speech than he had originally contemplated.
Whatever happened to the Stupid Party? Remember those guys? Leadfooted, lumpen geeks with no clue? The guys who looked so hapless up against Slick Willie?
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online