By W. James Antle, III on 8.29.08 @ 8:54PM
John McCain takes a chance on Sarah Palin, but it may be well worth the risk.
Over the past few weeks, conservatives contemplated John
McCain's vice presidential choice with a growing sense of
foreboding. The names that were being floated included pro-choice
Rudy Giuliani, all-around moderate Tom Ridge, and independent
Democrat Joe Lieberman. Even Mitt Romney had his detractors and Tim
Pawlenty could at best do no harm.
Goodbye to all that. Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has rallied the
conservative base like McCain himself never could.
Rush Limbaugh was ecstatic, crying, "Babies, guns, Jesus. Hot
damn!" A caller paraphrased Michelle Obama: "For the first time in
years, I am proud to be a Republican." James Dobson called her an
"outstanding" running mate who would secure his
vote this fall. Notoriously hard-to-please
conservative activist Richard Viguerie pronounced Palin "perfect."
Pat Buchanan offered a more sober assessment of the onetime Buchananite's value to the Republican
ticket: "This is the biggest political gamble I have ever seen. She
is enormously exciting but if, God forbid, something happens, can
she be president?"
"Gamble" is exactly the right word. Palin is high-risk but also
potentially high-reward. As a relatively young (44) first-term
governor of a small state, Palin undercuts the experience argument
against Barack Obama as much as Joe Biden undermines Obama's
message of foreign-policy prescience and change. If the pick is
seen as unserious or as tokenism, if she stumbles once in the
national spotlight, or if she falls victim to her own version of
trooper gate, it could be one mistake too many for a
Republican ticket that has little margin for error.
But the 2006 elections left the Republican bench in tatters and
McCain, facing a Democratic opponent who would make history if
elected, may not have had the luxury of a safe choice. If Palin
succeeds, she can bring in women voters, including disgruntled
Hillary supporters, without alienating pro-life social
conservatives. She has already excited anti-McCain conservatives
going into the Republican National Convention in St. Paul.
Republicans cannot be silent when Democrats claim there isn't a
dime's worth of difference between Palin and Obama when it comes to
their resumes. That doesn't mean they should inflate her
qualifications, by talking about her "foreign policy" dealings with
Canada or status as head of Alaska's National Guard. Instead the
argument must be that where Obama talks about reform, Palin
delivers.
When a sitting Republican governor proposed an unpopular
petroleum profits tax at a rate favored by a company that illegally
funded money to his reelection campaign, Palin took him on. When he
bought himself a plane at taxpayer expense over the legislature's
objections, she committed to sell it if elected. Palin beat that
governor by 32 points in the GOP primary.
Palin kept her promise to sell her predecessor's plane. She
locked swords with Sen. Ted Stevens over the Bridge to Nowhere,
which she dismantled. She endorsed her Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell in a
tight Republican primary against Congressman Don Young.
For all Obama's talk about taking unpopular reformist stands, he
has generally favored bipartisan ethics bills that pass by lopsided
margins. He has seldom picked a fight with powerful members of his
own party -- unless they were running against him for public office
-- or any interest group in the Democratic coalition. And he lacks
her track record of truly seeking to eliminate wasteful spending, a
new commitment he adopted in his Denver acceptance speech.
To this writer, the biggest concern about Sarah Palin is not
that she will hurt McCain but the opposite. A defeat would cause
Palin to lose some of her luster. A McCain-Palin victory will
deprive Alaska of an effective reformist governor and the
conservative movement of a much-needed governing success story at
the state level.
This is not to say the Palin pick can't backfire. Neutralize the
experience advantage and it makes it easier for the Democrats to
turn this election into a referendum on George W. Bush. Republicans
will not like the result of such a referendum. In politics, there
are also always good reasons to fear the unknown. Palin may yet
prove a political disaster.
But Palin has already bridged gaps within the GOP coalition that
once seemed unbridgeable and deflected media attention away from
Obama less than a day after the Invesco speech. There isn't much
upside in losing the presidential race narrowly. McCain is taking a
big gamble, but in this case it is worth rolling the dice.
topics:
Foreign Policy, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Sarah Palin, Alaska