The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

That's Hot

Politics gets celebritized. Bayh the way. Playing the odds. Plus more.

(Page 7 of 13)

Each state has its unique political characteristics, demographics, and, sometimes most important, other sets of political races and/or referenda -- each of which can influence outcomes in the presidential race, each of which varies from year to year, and none of which are considered in preparing the sample. No "national" poll which pretends to be random can take all of that into consideration. Nor can a "statewide" poll, for that matter.

Assume that our intrepid pollster pushes on. Immediately upon deciding which of the thousands of telephone directories in each state he will use, the pollster destroys randomness. Skew.

Then, upon picking up each chosen telephone directory to "randomly" select people to call, the pollster has skewed his results toward people who have a telephone AND a listed number. Skew.

He then has to ask whether the person called wishes to participate -- another skew. He then has to decide to take whoever answers the telephone, or to screen out non-registered voters, or registered voters who tell him they don't plan to vote. Skew, skew, skew.

He then has to depend on the veracity of the called person. Skew.

Heaven forbid that the pollster avoids these problems by setting up a database from which to select called persons. Let's see, how do I indicate a frenzied shouting of SKEW!

Then he has to introduce all of the adjustments the pollster silently makes in order to make his non-random sample seem random or unbiased.

Howard Hirsch wrote in a letter published on August 1st: "Of course, the trick is to make the sample as random as possible, or at least stratified according to known characteristics. In that regard, sadly, most current polling falls far short." Well said, Mr. Hirsch.

Something is either "random" or it's not "random." There's no "as random as possible." "Stratification" further destroys randomness. And, according to Mr. Hirsch, pollster don't even do those things well.

Skewed is skewed, whether it is accidental or intentional.

A pox on pollsters. A poll pox.

p>Randomly applied, of course. br> -- A. C. Santore /p>
Page: ‹ First   5 67 8 9   Last ›

topics:
Health Care, John McCain, Television, Abortion, Hollywood, Law, NATO, Energy, Oil

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/08/07/thats-hot

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT