The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Huffington Puffington

The tactics of Arianna and her gang. Grab the harpoons. Caribou for two. Forever Young in Alaska. Plus more.

(Page 2 of 12)

ad hominem attack is a sure and first sign of a losing argument. The Royal Couple and their legions lead with it as a matter of routine. How juvenile. br> -- Reid Bogie br> Waterbury, Connecticut /p>

I don't know if I've ever read such blatant lies in my life. I'm sure the author can find good reason to have a two-sided argument about whether blacks should still be enslaved, or that child abuse is a beneficial activity. The pure fact is that conservatives are not interested in small government for the sake of encouraging freedom (see their great backing of expanded military and prisons). Conservatives want smaller government because without someone looking over their shoulder, it makes it much easier to swindle people out of their wages, out of their homes, out of their life savings. It makes it easier for them to get rich by charging extremely high prices for energy and take food out of the mouths of children by forcing their parents to work for less than a living wage. The conservative philosophy with regard to the economy is, "To hell with you...I'm rich!"

The conservatives don't care about education, about the poor, about single mothers, or about people out of work. The only time we see these satans raise their head at all is to protest anything that might take an additional 10% off of their multi-million dollar salaries. Elitists! Except for the less fortunate conservatives who have been tricked into thinking that these rich people actually care about them! It's a joke. I work for an investment bank and so I see everyday how rich people look for ways to pay poor people less and less money. Romney is in this crowd. He made his money by firing poor people at struggling companies.

p>God will ensure that each and every one gets what they deserve in the end. br> -- Adrian S. Roberts /p> p> I read a book a few years ago about mathematics where the author stated that our education system has replaced logical reasoning with emotive reasoning. (It was about mathematics, I could not tell you the author's political views). Many of Arianna and her fellow travelers seem to fall into the emotion as argument category. (I think Bill Cosby or another comedian made a reference years ago that, just because you can yell louder doesn't make you more correct). Because they are more passionate and dramatic in their presentations, they must be correct. When emotion drives your actions, it is easy to be made afraid, and when you are afraid, you react by getting rid of what scares you, by whatever means necessary. When you silence dissent or an opposing view, it is easier feel in control. Who wants to be afraid and not be in control of the situation? br> -- Rebecca Welton
Page:   12 3 4   Last ›

topics:
Education, John McCain, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Clinton, Earmarks, Environment, Law, Military, Conservatism, Energy, Alaska, Oil

Letter to the Editor View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/06/26/huffington-puffington
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Middle-Aged Man Takes a Holiday

Christopher Orlet | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT