The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email

Reader Mail

Clinton Uprising

(Page 4 of 4)

Tom Udall is a liberal earth warming eco-nut who is selling snake oil to the masses. Steve Pearce is a strong conservative who understands the need for smaller government and for producing energy from our internal resources. Udall is in favor of illegal immigrant amnesty, Pearce opposes amnesty. In fact, they are exact opposites on all issues.

This is a bellwether senatorial race. Will the Republican National Committee support Pearce? If not, then we will know that the Republican Party is the RINO Party.
-- Nelson Ward
Cowles, New Mexico

YOU'LL ONLY MAKE IT WORSE
Re: Jeffrey Lord's LBJ's List and the Conservative Challenge:

I have only one point to make regarding Mr. Lord's piece on the failure of the Great Society. There will never be an effective "conservative" response to liberal spending in Washington. Why? Because the whole point of the Federal Government, at this time, is to spend money. And every politician there has as his or her number one goal the maintenance of their position. They do this by spending money, OUR money. And no one; conservative, liberal or independent; is going to do anything meaningful to change that.

In point, the Reagan Era was marked by a general growth of government. Yes, there were the famous Reagan tax cuts, but they served to generate more revenue for an already bloated federal bureaucracy. The Republican revolt of 1994 and its "Contract with America" promised smaller, cheaper government. A decade later, there was little or no observable difference in the spending habits of Republicans and Democrats and the Federal bureaucracy had doubled in size. In fact, civilian government [from federal to local] is the largest industry in the US and produces nothing; when, in fact, it should be just slightly larger than fish farming.

No, there will be no effective conservative response to government spending; simply because, once conservative politicians step through the looking glass into Washington, D.C., they behave just like every other tax and spend politician there. No matter who is in power in Washington, there will be grass growing in the streets in ten years. Though I do agree that Republicans can accomplish this more cheaply.
-- Michael Tobias

Oddly, there are some programs that could be added to LBJ's list and fit right in despite those who suggested them. Neither Mr. Lord's article nor any of the reader's responses published named them.

In no particular order, we have No Child Left Behind, Medicare Drug Benefits, the War on Drugs, Ethanol Subsidies, Immigration Reform '86, and the latest Farm Bill of '08.

What do all of these have in common? They greatly expanded the power of the Federal Government, reduced the American citizen's personal liberties and/or purchasing power, and have all demonstrated the consistent capability for Government to fail. The fact that all were passed through with support of supposedly conservative Republicans doesn't change the fact that all were liberal policies.

With Mr. Kibbe's article on Senator Grassley, these additions clearly demonstrate why Republican's have lost the Congress, and why the conservative movement needs some new champions.

Republicans are not necessarily conservative, no matter what they may say. If the Republicans want to regain a position of power and respect, they will need to find the correct definition of Conservative. Then they need to live that definition. Vote it, speak it, defend it, and breathe it.

And finally, I suggest anyone who thinks that LBJ's programs, or the additions I have mentioned here, are such Great Things need review the Wizard's Second Rule: The worst of consequences come from the actions of the best intentions.
-- Charles Campbell
Austin, Texas

OBAMA ONLINE
Re: G. Tracy Mehan, III's Obama's Fast Draw:

Obama's fast draw -- his name is George Soros & his bundling crew! Follow the money, all directions point to Soros.
-- Kathy
Arizona

Page: ‹ First   2 34

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Trade, Health Care, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Mainstream Media, Business, Islam, Global Warming, Books, Constitution, Law, Military, Iran, NATO, Immigration, Energy, Oil, Medicare

Comments

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

The Day Ahead: November 23

Maia Lazar

* * * *

Why Does Alyssa Milano Hate Me?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

In Sum, IPCC Discredited

Paul Chesser

* * * *

That Dangerous Radical . . . Marvin Olasky?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

No More Mr. Nice Charlie?

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

The Evening Keynote

Rep. Mike Pence

* * * *

The Girl Who Cried Racism

Christopher Orlet

* * * *

The 12 C's of Climate Alarmism

Paul Chesser

* * * *

So Sioux Me

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Methodist Madame

Mark Tooley

* * * *

Advent Is Coming

Jonathan Aitken

* * * *

Imperial Hypocrisy

Ralph R. Reiland

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT