By W. James Antle, III on 6.9.08 @ 12:09AM
Hillary's reluctant concession proves that the Clintons no longer control the Democratic Party.
No matter what November brings, Barack Obama has managed to
accomplish something no Republican has done since 1980: He has
wrung a concession speech out of the Clintons.
Clintonite dead-enders may never forgive him for it. As Hillary
Rodham Clinton suspended her presidential campaign and pledged to
back the man who defeated her in the Democratic delegate race,
there was a smattering of boos the first time Obama's name was
mentioned. Nevertheless, Hillary intoned, "I endorse him, and throw
my full support behind him. And I ask all of you to join me in
working as hard for Barack Obama as you have for me."
The era of Bill's government is over -- for now, at least.
Hillary Clinton was supposed to be the inevitable nominee. She
led in the early polls and the first superdelegate tallies. Obama
stumbled in the summer and fall of 2007, raising questions about
whether such an inexperienced candidate could possibly compete with
the Clinton machine. In October 2007, Hillary led Obama 57 percent
to 33 percent among black registered Democrats. She was the choice
of 68 percent of black women voters.
Then a funny thing happened on the way to the Clinton
restoration. Obama won the Iowa caucuses. Hillary finished third.
Her image of inevitability was forever shattered. Black voters,
sensing a historic opportunity, began moving en masse to Obama. The
Clinton campaign found itself ill prepared for a long, drawn-out
contest with a freshman senator they planned to dispatch quickly.
Mark Penn famously misunderstood how California's delegates were
allocated. The Clintons took a pass on the caucus states, allowing
Obama's young and enthusiastic supporters to out-hustle them for
delegates.
Bill Clinton's famous political skills failed him. The man Toni
Morrison called our "first black president" displayed a tin ear for
African Americans. He belittled Obama as a "kid" whose campaign
pitch on the Iraq war was "the biggest fairytale." After Obama won
the South Carolina primary with more than 80 percent of the black
vote, the former president was seen as comparing Obama's appeal to
Jesse Jackson's. By the end of the race, Hillary's share of the
black vote in many primaries tumbled to Barry Goldwater-size
percentages.
Obama and Clinton split the Super Tuesday states. Instead of
wrapping up the nomination in February, Hillary found herself on
the wrong end of an 11-state Obama winning streak. By the time she
regained her footing -- and regain it she did with spectacular
showings in the fourth quarter of the game -- she was too far
behind to catch up easily.
The handwriting was on the wall before the first ballots were
cast. Clinton fatigue was for real, and present even among
Democrats. During the 1990s, liberals put up with triangulation,
business-friendly centrism, and the permanent campaign because they
were tired of the beatings administered by Republican presidential
candidates. Bill Clinton was a winner and his enemies were in the
vast right-wing conspiracy.
But liberal misgivings about the Clinton bargain were obvious as
early as 2000, when nearly 3 million mostly progressive voters
bolted the Democratic Party for Ralph Nader rather than support a
triangulating Gore-Lieberman ticket. The liberal media had pent up
frustrations with the Clintons. And the left did not enjoy seeing
the campaign tactics that were used against Newt Gingrich and Ken
Starr bashing one of the Democrats' rising stars.
Democrats learned they could win elections without the Clintons.
Combative, non-triangulating Democrats won the 2006 elections.
Clinton opponents took control of the Democratic National Committee
and the house speakership. The political analyst Chuck Todd rightly
pointed out that it should have been a warning sign when only 25
percent of the superdelegates initially came out for Clinton.
Obama subtly but masterfully tapped into Clinton fatigue on the
left and center. His change narrative could be applied to the
Clintons as easily as the Bushes. He spoke out against a war
Democrats despised and the ever-cautious Hillary voted to
authorize. He didn't differ much on policy, except where he was
frequently to her left, but he differed in style.
Hillary, by contrast, campaigned as if she were running for the
Republican nomination. She talked about experience and implied it
was her turn. She played up her (thin) commander-in-chief
credentials, asking voters which candidate they wanted answering
the phone at 3 a.m. She focused on the big states even though none
of them were winner-take-all.
Give the lady her due, however. Hillary was a remarkably
resilient candidate. She fought back from defeat in Iowa to win New
Hampshire. She piled up wins in California, New York, Texas, Ohio,
and Pennsylvania. Although she entered politics as a McGovern
Democrat, winning the endorsement of George McGovern himself in her
2008 race, Hillary morphed into a Hubert Humphrey Democrat when she
needed to counter Obama's coalition of affluent white liberals and
90 percent of blacks ("eggheads and African-Americans," Clinton
confidante Paul Begala called them).
Hillary Clinton is the last person you would think could do a
convincing enough blue-collar impression to win over culturally
conservative Catholics in the Midwest and working-class white
Protestants in Appalachia. Yet when the delegate math
overwhelmingly favored Obama, she rolled up a 41-point margin in
West Virginia and a 30-point victory in Kentucky. On the night
Obama clinched the nomination, she bested him by ten points in
South Dakota.
In the process, Hillary exposed weaknesses in -- and fostered
resentments against -- Obama's candidacy. To many working-class
whites and some Latinos, Obama does not yet represent change they
can believe in. Hillary's women
supporters felt cheated in the Democratic Party's
identity-politics game. Her strong showing in the popular vote --
she trails Obama by just 0.1 percent without Michigan and leads him
by 0.8 percent when the Wolverine State is included -- led to cries
of "selected, not elected." The 2000 hangover has left Democrats
unable to lose gracefully even to one another.
None of this has gone unnoticed by John McCain. He will redouble
his efforts in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. McCain spoke to
the Clinton supporters' anger when he said last week, "Pundits and
party elders have decided Senator Obama will be my opponent." The
presumptive Republican nominee hopes we will hear from Hillary's
angriest supporters again in the fall.
We certainly haven't heard the last of the Clintons themselves.
Even in defeat, they are a force to be reckoned with. But they
don't look so invincible -- or inevitable -- anymore.
topics:
John McCain, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Business, Iraq, NATO, Africa