By W. James Antle, III on 5.12.08 @ 12:08AM
For Barack Obama, it's a time to fight for the white working-class vote.
With Barack Obama hurtling toward the Democratic nomination,
Hillary Clinton has one last arrow in her quiver: the
superdelegates' fear that Obama might not carry enough
working-class white voters to win the election in November.
After ten straight Obama victories in February, these voters
still delivered Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania to Clinton as if
nothing had happened. With Obama now ahead among superdelegates for the very first
time and the nomination almost certainly his, a TSG Consulting poll
shows Clinton up 63 percent to 23 percent in West Virginia. A May 4
Rasmussen poll shows a 56 percent to 27 percent Clinton lead.
The story is the same in Kentucky, where Survey USA shows
Clinton leading Obama by 36 points, 62 percent to 28 percent. A May
5 Rasmussen poll has the race only a little closer, at 56 percent
to 31 percent. West Virginia and Kentucky are both heavily
working-class and overwhelmingly white. The former is just 3.3
percent black, the latter 7.5 percent.
Hillary Clinton isn't shy about pointing out these demographics.
She told USA Today she had "a much broader
base to build a winning coalition on," even pointing to an
Associated Press report she characterized as showing "how Sen.
Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white
Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who
had not completed college were supporting me."
Clinton spinner Paul Begala, implicitly acknowledging Obama's
strength among well educated white liberal voters, argued on CNN
that the Democrats can't win with just "eggheads and
African-Americans."
Of course, Hillary cannot win with this kind of rhetoric. The
coalition Obama put together to beat Clinton -- combining 90
percent of the black vote with uncharacteristically energized young
voters and the type of affluent white liberal who supported Gary
Hart, Paul Tsongas, Bill Bradley, and Howard Dean -- would be
demoralized if the superdelegates took the nomination from them at
this point. The Democrats cannot win without white working-class
voters in Ohio and Pennsylvania, but neither are they likely to win
with a candidate who takes less than 10 percent of the black vote
in Democratic primaries. The wife of America's "first black
president" is winning a share of the African-American vote
comparable to Barry Goldwater's.
But that doesn't mean Clinton is necessarily wrong. The
continued resistance of white working-class voters to Obama's
charms ought to concern the Democrats and will likely be the first
thing they try to address when the nomination race is over. Their
problem may require a radical solution: Jim Webb.
VIRGINIA'S FRESHMAN Democratic senator devoted much of his
pre-political life to celebrating the Scots-Irish and the white
working class. He embraces the word "redneck" as a badge of honor,
writing, "The culture so dramatically symbolized by the Southern
redneck [is] the greatest inhibitor of the plans of the activist
Left and the cultural Marxists for a new kind of society
altogether." He has even defended the patriotism and honor of Confederate
soldiers.
Webb represents a kind of voter the Republicans have lost over
the past eight years, having once been a Republican himself and one
who endorsed George W. Bush and the man he unseated two years ago
in the 2000 elections. He is a decorated Marine and former Reagan
secretary of the navy, boasting strong foreign-policy and
national-security credentials without having supported the war. In
fact, his early opposition to the Iraq invasion on realist
rather than McGovernite grounds is what drove him from the GOP in
the first place.
In his forthcoming book A Time to Fight, Webb
criticizes Democratic leaders for prioritizing "hard-to-grasp
themes such as the environment and global warming" over
bread-and-butter issues "when our national security is in such
disarray and our workers are watching their jobs disappear." And in
a chapter entitled "A Nation Descended from Many Nations," in which
he makes nice with the multiculturalists he once excoriated, he
still writes, "We must, as a nation and as a government, struggle
with such issues as illegal immigration and the extent that
portions of the so-called diversity programs improperly affect
fairness and government policy." That seems a longwinded way of
saying he understands many working-class whites are disadvantaged
by porous borders and preferential policies.
There are equally strong reasons for Obama to be wary of Webb.
Webb is notoriously a loose cannon, whose prickliness and past
writings could cause the Democrats no small amount of grief. He is
reportedly disengaged from retail politics,
preferring to write instead. And Webb is unlikely to be a docile
number-two.
WHILE BOTH LIBERALS and conservatives alike have claimed Webb, many
of his actual policy views are unformed and prone to shift. He
defended capital gains tax cuts during the 2006 Senate race but
complains in A Time to Fight that the cap gains rate is
lower than the income tax on wages. He has abandoned his critiques
of feminism, affirmative action, and leading Democrats. He
represents Middle Ohio's views on trade and outsourcing but not on
values: he is reliably pro-abortion and supportive of same-sex
marriage. Webb's margin of victory over George Allen came not from
the conservative parts of Virginia but the liberal D.C.-spillover
suburbs up north.
In the Senate, Webb is more slightly more independent than the
average freshman but his voting record mostly looks like a typical
liberal Democrat's. As your humble servant has put it, he writes like Pat Buchanan and votes
like Harry Reid.
Webb wouldn't be the safest pick for shoring up the white
working class and winning key swing states. A cautious politician
might prefer Ed Rendell or Ted Strickland, the Clinton-endorsing
Democratic governors of Pennsylvania and Ohio. But would a cautious
politician be running for president three years out of the Illinois
state legislature?
topics:
Trade, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Abortion, Environment, Global Warming, Iraq, NATO, Africa, Immigration