The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Campaign Crawlers
Print Email
Text Size

Campaign Crawlers

Don't Stop Worrying About the Clintons

And don't pretend to admire Hillary for her "tenacity," please.

HIGH POINT/RALEIGH, NC -- These days, Hillary Clinton is all the rage among conservatives.

Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos" -- an attempt to convince his Republican listeners to cross over and vote for Clinton in the Democratic primaries -- continues. Last week, Bill O'Reilly turned his "No Spin Zone" into a two-day infomercial for Clinton, featuring an adoring interview in which he lobbed one Katie Couric-style softball after another at his home state Senator.

Conservatives have found common cause with the Clinton machine in seeking to bring Barack Obama down to earth. The strange, accidental, alliance has helped keep the media focused on Obama's relationships with anti-American pastor Jeremiah Wright and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, as well as his comments about small town voters "clinging" to guns and religion.

In his New York Times column last week, William Kristol argued that Clinton wasn't getting enough respect among the liberal media, and speaking for his fellow conservatives, he declared that "it falls to us to praise Hillary."

But any conservatives who have grown to respect Clinton over the course of this year really need to get out more.

ON THE TRAIL these days, Clinton is waging a campaign whose motto should be "Say Anything."

The candidate who last year spoke of how she was cursed with a "responsibility gene" is now staking her candidacy on a barrage of policy proposals that are completely untenable, and focused mainly on inciting middle class anger toward a carefully chosen list of enemies.

Midday Monday, Clinton held her last rally in the state before today's primary at the High Point train depot in front of a few hundred people. With noisy trains speeding below the elevated platform, Clinton made pledges that had her sounding like a candidate for student council promising to improve cafeteria food or add more vacation days.

"I will get tough on China," she vowed, slamming the country that "sends us back lead-laced toys, contaminated food, and polluted pharmaceuticals." But her husband profited greatly both during and after his presidency from close ties to China and expanded the U.S. economic relationship with the country by fighting for its most favored nation status.

Clinton promised to "take on the predatory student loan companies," and shouted, "We need to take on the Wall Street bankers and mortgage companies that misled so many people into these subprime mortages."

But her plan to place a moratorium on foreclosures and freeze interest rates for five years would only exacerbate the credit crisis by scaring away lenders fearing that the federal government will arbitrarily rewrite the terms of contracts. It also remains questionable whether such a law would even be constitutional.

"We're going to go after OPEC," she hollered, dismissing it as "monopoly cartel" in which members "sit in some conference room a couple of times a year, decide how much oil they are going to produce, and how much they are going to charge for it."

It's a nice idea, but her strategy of changing laws to sue the organization on anti-trust grounds is risible, because it's hard to see how the group would abide by any U.S. court decision.

The latest addition to her stable of panders is to suspend the gas tax this summer. Her plan differs from Sen. John McCain's similar proposal, because, she wants "oil companies, out of their excess profits, to pay the gas tax this summer, instead of having you pay it."

But even the most basic course in economics would teach that any such tax would ultimately be passed onto the consumer, because the price of gas would increase to reflect the added cost.

Page: 1 2  

topics:
John McCain, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Economics, Religion, Constitution, Law, NATO, Oil

About the Author

Philip Klein is The American Spectator's Washington correspondent. You can follow him on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/Philipaklein

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Philip Klein

More Articles From Campaign Crawlers

http://spectator.org/archives/2008/05/06/dont-stop-worrying-about-the-c

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 12:48PM

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 10:35AM

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT