By W. James Antle, III on 4.21.08 @ 12:08AM
Alan Keyes has deserted the GOP. Will his new party take him?
In the grand tradition of the Boston Tea Party, Tax Day is as
good a time as any to begin a struggle for independence. Perhaps
that's why perennial candidate Alan Keyes picked April 15 to
announce his departure from the Republican
Party, though a cheeky blogger for the Los Angeles Times
had a slightly different take: "Alan Keyes officially leaves
GOP and hardly anyone notices."
Keyes certainly didn't have a noticeable impact on the 2008
Republican presidential primaries, where his highly unorthodox
campaign made both his 43-point loss to Barack Obama in the 2004
Illinois Senate race and his 42-point defeat by Barbara Mikulski
during a 1992 Maryland Senate run seem like successes by
comparison. Keyes spent much of his time campaigning in Texas,
where he won just 0.62 percent of the vote. His best showing was in
the Kansas caucus, where he received 1.5 percent. Keyes's bizarre
performance at the Des Moines Register debate before the
Iowa caucuses was the first -- and last -- time he made news during
his GOP run.
This week, Keyes is expected to make a bid for the Constitution
Party's presidential nomination, which will be determined at the
party's national convention in Kansas City, Missouri, on Friday and
Saturday. "If Dr. Keyes's positions on the issues square up with
the CP platform we'd be thrilled to have him represent us and offer
Americans a choice that the other 'Big Box' parties don't," says
Constitution Party communications director Mary Starrett. But there
is no guarantee that Keyes will be finding electoral success in his
new party either.
At first glance, Keyes ought to be a good fit for the
Constitution Party. Both are unapologetically pro-life and animated
by Christian conservative issues. Both favor the abolition of the
income tax. Keyes has in the past addressed the party's gatherings,
hobnobbed with its leaders, and championed many of their political
causes. But the Constitution Party is predominantly
paleoconservative and Keyes isn't exactly.
Many Constitution Party members are former Pat Buchanan
Republicans. Veteran leader and three-time presidential candidate
Howard Phillips thrice sought to have Buchanan run on the party's
national ticket. The bad blood between the Buchanan brigades and
the Keyesters dates back to the 1996 Republican primaries, when
many of the former saw Keyes as a stalking horse out to siphon
pro-life, socially conservative votes away from Buchanan. Keyes
took 7 percent in the Iowa caucuses, for example, where Bob Dole
only beat Buchanan by three points.
Other party members point to philosophical differences with
Keyes. Trent Hill of the Louisiana Constitution Party told me in an
e-mail that Keyes "is a good man" who will be "respected and
welcomed by all within the party." But he expressed concerns about
Keyes's "interventionist leanings" when it comes to foreign policy.
"Also at issue, especially with some of the more philosophically
astute delegates, is that Keyes is a friend of William Kristol's, a
student of [Harvey] Mansfield's, and a follower of [Leo] Strauss,'"
Hill wrote. "As I'm sure you're aware, this is a neoconservative
crowd, and the neoconservatives are the diametric opposites of the
paleoconservatives (at least within the conservative
spectrum)."
THE BIGGEST issue separating Keyes from the Constitution Party is
the Iraq war. Keyes has said that he would not have picked Iraq as
the next target in the war on terror, but supported the president's
policy in debates with Obama four years ago and would not withdraw
U.S. troops today. His new party, however favors a
noninterventionist foreign policy and opposes the war. This is not
an insignificant difference of opinion.
Ricardo Davis, the state party chairman for Georgia, says any
attempt to abandon the antiwar stance will go over about as well as
the New Coke. "What if I was the new CEO of a midsized company and
decided embark on a strategy to sell a 'me too' product that
negates the company's unique sales proposition?" he asks. "What if
that sales proposition is held dear by most of the sales and
marketing management in the company? What do you think will happen
to that company as I try to change the company's direction? A train
wreck would look prettier!"
Some of the people Keyes might bring with him into the
Constitution Party aren't budging in their support for the war,
either. A poster on Keyes's web forum argues that "the CP expresses the same naive view as my
long time congressional hero Ron Paul did" and questions why a
Christian political party wouldn't "understand the nature of the
enemy."
Is Keyes cooked? "What you run into are a lot of single-issue
pro-lifers who view Alan Keyes as a positive name," says Red
Phillips, a paleoconservative who opposes Keyes's nomination.
Phillips also worries that other party members will want a well
known presidential candidate. "There's talk about us crossing the
million vote threshold if we nominate Keyes," he says. "I don't
think that's very realistic, since not even Pat Buchanan got a
million votes [as the Reform Party nominee] in 2000."
Chuck Baldwin, a pastor and columnist who was the Constitution Party's 2004
vice presidential nominee, has said he will accept the nomination
if offered. Baldwin is unlikely to carry his party across the
200,000 vote threshold, much less one million. If neither Ron Paul
nor "Ten Commandments" Judge Roy Moore are open to being drafted,
Keyes would be the biggest name in the race -- the best political
position he's been in since winning a 14-candidate Maryland GOP
primary in 1992 -- and yet he's still no shoo-in.
Last Thursday, Keyes took part in a conference call with state
Constitution Party leaders. Instead of smoothing over their
differences on the Iraq war and other issues, at least one
participant remembers Keyes being more interested in talking than
listening. "I appreciate that Alan speaks his mind," says Davis.
"But he is seeking our nomination, not the other way around."
During Keyes's first presidential campaign, Rich Lowry observed, "His unmatched skill in impassioned
oratory is accompanied by a deficit in more mundane political
abilities, such as listening, glad-handing, and gauging his effect
on those around him." That was the talented Dr. Keyes's downfall in
the Republican Party. The problem may have followed him into the
Constitution Party as well.
topics:
Foreign Policy, Barack Obama, Constitution, Iraq