Richard Dawkins, PZ Myers, and some other Darwinists are
horrified that the forthcoming documentary,
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, will promote
Intelligent Design to a large audience when it opens at over a
thousand theaters nationwide on April 18. Ironically, their
campaign to discredit Ben Stein and the film confirms its main
point, which is to expose the persecution meted out by Darwinists
to those daring to criticize Darwinian theory.
One aspect of Expelled that troubles Dawkins and some
of his colleagues is its treatment of the ethical implications of
Darwinism, especially its discussion of the historical connections
between Darwinism and Nazism. Isn’t this a bit over-the-top,
suggesting that Darwinism has something to do with Nazism? After
all, Darwinists today are not Nazis, and Darwinism has nothing to
do with anti-Semitism.
However, what is most objectionable about the Nazis’ worldview?
Isn’t it that they had no respect for human life? Their rejection
of the sanctity of human life led the Nazi regime to murder
millions of Jews, hundreds of thousands of Gypsies, and about
200,000 disabled Germans. Where did the Nazis get the idea that
some human beings were “lives unworthy of life”?
As I show in meticulous detail in my book, From Darwin to
Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany,
the Nazis’ devaluing of human life derived from Darwinian ideology
(this does not mean that all Nazi ideology came from Darwinism).
There were six features of Darwinian theory that have contributed
to the devaluing of human life (then and now):
1. Darwin argued that humans were not qualitatively different
from animals. The leading Darwinist in Germany, Ernst Haeckel,
attacked the “anthropocentric” view that humans are unique and
special.
2. Darwin denied that humans had an immaterial soul. He and
other Darwinists believed that all aspects of the human psyche,
including reason, morality, aesthetics, and even religion,
originated through completely natural processes.
3. Darwin and other Darwinists recognized that if morality was
the product of mindless evolution, then there is no objective,
fixed morality and thus no objective human rights. Darwin stated in
his Autobiography that one “can have for his rule of life,
as far as I can see, only to follow those impulses and instincts
which are the strongest or which seem to him the best ones.”
4. Since evolution requires variation, Darwin and other early
Darwinists believed in human inequality. Haeckel emphasized
inequality to such as extent that he even classified human races as
twelve distinct species and claimed that the lowest humans were
closer to primates than to the highest humans.
5. Darwin and most Darwinists believe that humans are locked in
an ineluctable struggle for existence. Darwin claimed in The
Descent of Man that because of this struggle, “[a]t some
future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the
civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and
replace throughout the world the savage races.”
6. Darwinism overturned the Judeo-Christian view of death as an
enemy, construing it instead as a beneficial engine of progress.
Darwin remarked in The Origin of Species, “Thus, from the
war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which
we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher
animals, directly follows.”
These six ideas were promoted by many prominent Darwinian
biologists and Darwinian-inspired social thinkers in the late 19th
and early 20th centuries. All six were enthusiastically embraced by
Hitler and many other leading Nazis. Hitler thought that killing
“inferior” humans would bring about evolutionary progress. Most
historians who specialize in the Nazi era recognize the Darwinian
underpinnings of many aspects of Hitler’s ideology.
BUT WHAT DOES THIS have to do with the present? Darwinists today
are not Nazis.
If you look back at the six points outlined above, however, you
will find that many Darwinists today are advancing the same or
similar ideas. Many leading Darwinists today teach that morality is
nothing but a natural product of evolution, thus undermining human
rights. E. O. Wilson, one of the most prominent Darwinian
biologists in the world, and Michael Ruse, a leading philosopher of
science (the latter is in Expelled) famously stated that
ethics is “an illusion fobbed off on us by our genes.”
Many leading Darwinists today also claim that Darwinism
undermines the Judeo-Christian conception of the sanctity of human
life. Dawkins wrote in 2001 that we should try to genetically
engineer an evolutionary ancestor to the human species to demolish
the “speciesist” illusion that humans are special or sacred. In the
same article he expressed support for involuntary euthanasia.
Another critic of “speciesism,” Peter Singer, one of the leading
bioethicists in the world, argues that Darwinism destroyed the
Judeo-Christian sanctity-of-life ethic, so infanticide and
euthanasia are permissible. James Watson, one of the world’s most
famous geneticists and a staunch Darwinist, has railed at the idea
that humans are sacred and special.
Today’s Darwinists are not Nazis and not all Darwinists agree
with Dawkins, Wilson, Ruse, Singer, or Watson. However, some of the
ideas being promoted today by prominent Darwinists in the name of
Darwinism have an eerily similar ring to the ideologies that eroded
respect for human life in the pre-Nazi era.
