By W. James Antle, III on 4.7.08 @ 12:07AM
The great Libertarian hope could be John McCain's worst nightmare.
"As Dante Alighieri said many centuries ago, the hottest places
in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis,
maintain their neutrality." With that, former Congressman Bob Barr
announced to a group of Midwestern Libertarian
Party activists that he was taking the first step toward running
for president.
If nominated, Barr could be the most successful Libertarian
presidential candidate in the party's 37-year history -- and John
McCain's worst nightmare. For unlike Ed Clark, the current
Libertarian record-holder who won just under 1 million votes in the
1980 presidential race, Bob Barr is no "low-tax liberal."
Ever since Ronald Reagan appointed him U.S. attorney for the
northern district of Georgia in 1986, Barr has been a leader on
behalf of conservative causes (he has more recently, in the
interest of full disclosure, been a contributing editor to The
American Spectator). Representing Georgia's Seventh
Congressional District as a Republican from 1995 to 2003, he is
best known for his role in passing the Defense of Marriage Act --
which has kept the marriage laws of all 50 states from being at the
tender mercies of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court -- and
as a House manager in the impeachment of Bill Clinton.
In 2002, Barr lost his congressional seat after redistricting
forced him into a primary with fellow Republican Congressman John
Linder. After leaving the House, he has focused on civil liberties
and privacy protections, opposing the Bush administration on the
Patriot Act and its national surveillance program. These issues,
along with the explosion in federal spending, drove Bar toward the
Libertarian Party and away from the GOP.
Yet he didn't forget his old friends as he made new ones. Barr
involved conservative leaders Paul Weyrich and Grover Norquist in
his efforts to reform the Patriot Act; he also worked with David
Keene and Richard Viguerie to rein in Bush-era expansions of
executive power. Civil libertarians valued him as a bridge to the
right while his conservative allies regarded him a reminder of when
Republicans opposed the Clinton administration's power grabs and
activist foreign policy.
Barr can potentially appeal to disgruntled conservatives who see
the choice of McCain or the Democrats as analogous to picking
between being punched in the stomach or kneed in the groin. This
includes both the enthusiastic -- and generous -- grassroots
activists who powered libertarian Congressman Ron Paul's GOP
presidential campaign and many more conventional Republicans in
whom McCain inspires dyspepsia. No less a mainstream conservative
than Rush Limbaugh has argued that McCain's election would lead to
a revival of Rockefeller Republicanism. To some on the right,
that's as bad as extending the Clinton dynasty.
BUT FIRST BARR MUST move beyond the exploratory phase of his
campaign and win the Libertarian nomination, which seems doable but not inevitable. Libertarians are not
necessarily looking for the same things as anti-McCain Republicans.
Barr's 98 percent American Conservative Union rating,
pro-life voting record, and hard line on immigration might help him in the
general election. But these positions aren't necessarily assets in
a party that is officially pro-choice, supports open borders, and
prefers the Nolan Chart to the left-right political spectrum.
There are other issues that divide Ron Paul Republicans from
Rush Limbaugh Republicans. Barr voted for the Iraq war but now
opposes it. He also voted for the Patriot Act -- after sunset
provisions were included -- and now regrets doing so. He sponsored
an amendment to deny funds to the District of Columbia to
even conduct a ballot initiative on medical marijuana but has since
lobbied on behalf of the Marijuana Policy Project to have this
policy reversed. This pragmatism might make conservatives more
willing to listen. It could also brand Barr as the Libertarian
Party's Mitt Romney: a flip-flopper unacceptable to the purists he
is attempting to woo.
On foreign policy, Barr sounds like
Paul when he says "we are better than the policy of preemptive war"
and "must renew a commitment to non-intervention." But he is more
careful to emphasize that he is willing to use force against those
who would do America harm: "If attacked, the aggressor will
experience firsthand the skillful wrath of the American fighting
man."
Will that be good enough? Congressman Tom Tancredo ran for
president as a single-issue immigration restrictionist, an area
where he is much closer to Barr than McCain. Yet Tancredo told the Rocky Mountain News he was
reluctantly supporting McCain because he believes Barr has "a blind
spot on radical Islam."
The recent history of third-party challenges on the right is
similarly discouraging. Ron Paul won 0.5 percent of the vote as the
Libertarian nominee in 1988. Pat Buchanan, one of the most famous
conservatives in America, won 0.42 percent as the Reform Party
candidate in 2000. Both faced resistance within the parties that
nominated them on account of their more conventionally conservative
positions. John Schmitz, a sitting Republican congressman, managed
just 1.4 percent as the standard-bearer for George Wallace's
American Independent Party in 1972.
To find counterexamples, one must go back to Wallace himself in
1968 and Ross Perot in the 1990s. Neither man had very strong
conservative credentials. Perot actually did better among
independents and moderate Republicans than conservatives. But the
right remembers Perot as the man who helped elect Bill Clinton in
1992 and 1996, just as the left blames Ralph Nader for Al Gore's
defeat in 2000. If the McCain-Obama/McCain-Clinton is close, some
of the prodigal Republicans Barr is counting on may well return
home on Election Day.
If there are "sufficient numbers" of supporters, Barr will
try to defy the odds. He may feel he has no alternative if the only
other way to avoid the hottest places in hell is to choose between
two candidates he can only vote for when hell freezes over.
topics:
Foreign Policy, Bill Clinton, Islam, Abortion, Law, Iraq, Immigration