By Quin Hillyer on 3.27.08 @ 12:08AM
Tired of the "same, old, tired nostrums that got us into the current mess"? Here's a way out.
Conservatives need a new economic platform, one that the media
can't write off (no matter how unfairly) as the "same, old, tired
nostrums that got us into the current mess." Herewith, the planks
it should include:
Strengthen the dollar while letting interest rates
"float." I wrote on this here here,
among other places.
Eliminate the corporate income tax. I wrote
about this last
week.
Immediately cut all ethanol subsidies in half and
immediately cut all future biofuel mandates in half.
Ethanol subsidies and requirements are pushing up the price of
gasoline and of food across the board. New scientific studies show
that biofuel production actually adds to greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere rather than decreasing them, and that it will take 167
years before the so-called "benefits" of the fuels will eliminate
the "carbon debt" caused by these added greenhouse gases. Finally,
new studies show that ethanol is more dangerous than ordinary
gasoline, because the fires it sometimes fuels are more difficult
to extinguish.
Show concern about executive compensation. This
will not be a popular one with hard-liners, but it's important. It
really is a problem, both morally and politically, when corporate
execs get $70 million parachutes when they flee failed companies.
For that much money, 70,000 workers could each get raises of $1,000
per year. The solution, though, is not to tax executives directly.
Instead, the solution is to give companies an incentive not to
lavish so much wealth on so few individuals. Elimination of the
corporate income tax provides companies plenty of extra money to
afford this without even batting an eye: For ALL of an executive's
compensation above, say, $500,000 per year -- including the current
value of stock options, and including bonuses and anything set up
as "contract" work rather than wages -- have the company pay its
half (6.9 percent) of what the executive's Social Security taxes
would be if those taxes weren't capped as they presently are at
$102,000 annually. (The executive would not be made eligible for
any additional retirement benefits, though.)
The added 6.9 percent would be just enough to make a company
think twice about whether the extra costs are worth giving to an
already extremely wealthy executive or instead better spent on
R&D or on worker benefits, or whatever.
Meanwhile, the Social Security system could use the added
windfall to pay for the so-called "transition costs" for my next
item....
Implement Rep. Paul Ryan's GROW Accounts for Social
Security or Sen. Jim DeMint's similar plan. (See here or here.) Private accounts will work in
Social Security, and they can be sold as a viable option
for younger workers. (As a second stage of the project to save
Social Security, but only a second stage after private
accounts are established, conservatives can try to implement the
Pozen Plan) that would readjust the formula to
cover inflation but not full wage growth for upper-income workers.
The argument used to sell the Pozen Plan would be the one Fred
Thompson used in promoting his even tougher plan, namely that
grandparents should care for the futures of their
grandchildren.
Adopt the "Health Care Choice Act" by Rep. John Shadegg
and Sen. DeMint. (See here.) This one simple step of letting
individuals purchase medical insurance across state lines would
help the free market bring down health-care costs.
Expand Health Savings Accounts and adopt President
Bush's Proposal for tax credits for health insurance. The
idea, desperately needed, is to disconnect the health insurance
market from the workplace, while expanding insurance availability
and accessibility. This would be far easier to accomplish if the
corporate income tax were eliminated, because there would no longer
be the same tax incentives (e.g.. keeping employers'
health-insurance premiums tax-deductible) for the corporations to
provide the health coverage in the first place. There remains much
to like about companies offering health benefits if feasible, but
the current system is sclerotic.
Encourage voluntary associations to form health
insurance pools. The American economy is moving more and
more into an entrepreneurial model with self-employed
workers/business owners operating from private homes. There is a
greater need than ever for all these people to be able to enjoy the
same purchasing power through economies of scale that
corporate-provided health plans formerly accomplished (or were
supposed to accomplish).
Model all of Medicare on the competitive/free market
aspects of the otherwise ill-advised Medicare Part D (prescription
drug plan). The competitive bidding process in Part D has been a smashing success, keeping
prices extremely low and understandable choices abundant. The rest
of Medicare should ditch its bureaucratic model and follow the Part
D example.
Eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax. It's an
abomination.
Provide for a voluntary flat tax and a H.O.T.
Tax. (See here and here.) People who want the option of a massively
simpler way to pay taxes should have it; liberal rich folks who
think they are undertaxed should be encouraged to put their money
where their mouths are.
Eliminate all legislative earmarks for at least
four years. Wean Congress entirely off of purely local
pork entirely. And cut the overall appropriations for each agency
by at least half of the amount formerly used for earmarks; then use
that lower figure as the baseline for future budgets. After those
four years, Congress should appoint a commission to figure out if,
and under what extremely circumscribed conditions, earmarks are
ever appropriate. Among those circumstances: full transparency; a
public committee vote on each individual earmark; a full, written
description of the national (as opposed to purely local) need for
each particular earmark.
Re-establish deficit target enforcement of the
Gramm-Rudman-Hollings variety. To be constitutional, the enforcement
teeth for such budget-cutting rules may be weak if push comes to
shove -- but just having the moral suasion of such a law in place
can work wonders on the congressional psyche, at least for a little
while.
Okay -- that's enough for now. But even more good economic ideas
abound in the conservative intellectual universe. A benevolent
dictator who implemented just those mentioned in this column,
though, would surely catalyze the strongest, most lastingly solid
economy the world has ever known.
topics:
Taxes, Health Care, Business, Earmarks, Social Security, Constitution, Law, Medicare