RUNNIN' WILD
Re: Jeffrey Lord's The Liberal
Mania: Crazy in a Bubble:
Jeffrey Lord's "The Liberal Mania" may well be the best, most revealing, and informative essay in TAS in my memory. I struggle to find its equal.
Thanks, Mr. Lord.
-- A. C. Santore
Loved it! WFB's analogy of defining the irrational liberal thought
process in clinical terms is fitting. Michael Savage has described
it as "a mental disorder." When liberals speak about an issue, it's
only to tell you that you're wrong because you are a hateful,
insensitive S.O.B., oblivious to their own hateful insensitivities.
Liberals are often confused when making moral equivalencies, they
don't like to judge les they be judged themselves, "if it feels
good, do it," if it's matter of personal gain, then by all means
"just do it" (as proclaimed by a national advertising campaign),
there are no consequences (until there are consequences then the
blame goes to someone else). It's like living in a liberal fantasy
theme park -- Bizarro World!
-- John Nelson
Hebron, Connecticut
Reading Mr. Lord's piece I'm reminded of a Firing Line
show many years ago when Mr. Buckley's guest was an old
white-haired man named Foote (don't recall his first name) from
Great Britain. He was at the time or had been some head socialist
or Laborite leader or some such thing (sorry for the vagueness).
Mr. Foote was speaking in this insufferably snotty (I guess the
word today would be snarky) condescending manner and finally Mr.
Buckley stops him and says something like, "Before we go any
further, can we (you) get over this notion (or attitude) that
everything I say is crap and everything you say is non-crap." It
was beautiful. It illustrated the "there is no debate" attitude of
most liberals on duty mentioned in Mr. Lord's piece.
-- Jens Andersen
I admit it, you hooked me with your title Geraldine Limbaugh but
I'm glad you did. Jeffery Lord wrote a whiz-bang opinion piece. I
would have emailed him directly but I just couldn't get past the
salutation, Dear Mr. Lord, without my mind wandering. Keep up the
good work.
-- K. Wigen
DUDSVILLE
Re: Jackie Mason & Raoul Felder's Expedience
and Experience:
Indeed, how did we end up with these two duds, as Messrs. Mason and Felder posit?
In 1776 the population of the colonies was about three million out of which pool rose George Washington, John Adams, Sam Adams, Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, Paul Revere, Thomas Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, et al.
Two centuries later, the population of the U.S. is 100 times larger, and out crawl "these two duds." Painful to contemplate, no?
And the Democrats cast aside Joe Biden and Chris Dodd to get to where we are today.
Does "President McCain" sound likely?
-- Dick Crawford
Whatever Rev. Wright meant, the fundamental reality is that it is a conversation killer. Once any clergyman says "God d*mn America," 95% of Americans will head for the door. We can disagree whether they should or shouldn't; but no matter what or by how much Americans think American should change, they will not stand for the country they love to be cursed.
"God d*mn America" is so repulsive and pungent that it
overpowers and blows anything else that may be said off the table.
That's the reality and that's the end of it.
-- Michael Dooley
Indianapolis, Indiana
As usual Jackie and Raoul do not waste any words while stating the
obvious so much better than most. How did we indeed end up with
these two "duds" competing for the nomination of one of our major
parties? How indeed although to be truthful or factual the other
contenders (Dodd, Edwards, Richardson etc)were certainly no better.
It has been way too long since the Democrats had worthy even if
often wrong candidates competing in the arena of ideas. It seems to
me that Scoop Jackson was the last Democratic Party candidate that
the voters could really respect. That is an awfully long time ago
in this generation of instant gratification. I try not to be
pessimistic for too long a time but William Kristol's father Irving
was no doubt correct when he wrote in the WSJ in the
seventies that the culture war was over and we had lost. At the
time as the father of two young sons I struggled to disagree with
him but in retrospect he was more right than wrong. Mr. Kristol
also in a regrettably neglected book Two Cheers for
Capitalism wrote that corporate officers did not deserve the
monstrous salary and bonus packages they were being paid because
they were not risk takers or entrepreneurs but really just talented
employees or bureaucrats who should be paid good salaries but not
more. Viewing this idea today it seems obvious.
-- Jack Wheatley
Royal Oak, Michigan
The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?
Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.