The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email

Reader Mail

Tony's Awards

(Page 2 of 7)

You obviously produced your article, "Why Not Defeat" prior to this weekend.

This weekend, we had our 4,000th US death in Iraq, and scores of Iraqis killed in explosions around country.

I'd wait on helping Bush get back into that flight suit if I were Karl Rove.

Too funny!
-- Rick from Minnesota

Yes, Ms. Rubin, it is all about what has come to be called Bush Derangement Syndrome, but let us not too flippantly dismiss the importance of the conflict in Afghanistan in favor of the Iraqi portion of the war against radical Islam. I believe that a thorough reading of the articles coming from the reporters that are actually with the troops in those two operational areas will lead one to conclude that we are seeing the end stages of significant engagement in Iraq. When Al Qaeda is finally driven out of Mosul, they well be left with a scattered presence in smaller towns and rural areas. That well quickly become an untenable situation as significant additional sections of Iraqi society decide that they have had enough and join "The Awakening."

On the other hand, it is patently evident that we are already seeing a ramping up of the conflict in Afghanistan. The Taliban, with infusions of Al Qaeda trained and dedicated fighters are increasingly aggressive in Afghanistan, particularly in those areas that border on Pakistan. This summer looks as if it will see significant actions. The ambushes of our, and other country's, troops are becoming much more than the occasional flea on a camel's back. They are becoming set piece battles with double and triple digit losses to the Taliban/Qaeda troops in many more instances. Study history. Study geography. Study geo-political history and trends. Afghanistan is a darn tough nut to crack, but crack it we must.

This view completely leaves the internal conflict in Pakistan out of the question. That can no longer be tolerated in reasoned decision making. If we are not damned careful in our actions and policies, Pakistan could be lost to radical Islamic forces. It truly is very near a tipping point. The Bush administration has NOT been so sure footed as to give me confidence in their policies toward Pakistan and Musharraf. Many figures in the administration do not seem to grasp the importance of saving Musharraf's hide. It seems that we are very near to the same kind of deal that Jimmy Carter managed to thoroughly mess up with the Shah of Iran. So far the stories of the explosions within Pakistan are few and muted. The media has completely failed to explain the significance of our interests in a nuclear armed Pakistan. The media is almost totally oblivious to what it would mean if the Taliban got their hands on Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. Pakistan is a disaster in the process of happening. And if you do not understand what the Pakistani situation means within the context of Afghanistan, then please go back to see your governess and get her to explain it to you.

A good deal less flippancy regarding Afghanistan and Pakistan on your part, Ms. Rubin, would not only be advisable, but darn near mandatory.
-- Ken Shreve

For the last five years Americans have been subjected to a peculiar brand of liberal Democrat "logic" regarding the war on terror. I'm not referring to the moonbat segment of the party, for whom any military action is evidence of our moral decadence. I'm talking about liberals who espouse the idea that war in Afghanistan was good, but war in Iraq was bad.

After 9/11, these liberals recognized the necessity of responding to the worst domestic attack in American history. Invading Afghanistan was OK because al Qaeda used the country as a training camp with the blessings of the Taliban. Apparently for these liberals, all would have been right if our military action had been confined to that theater.

So here's the question: imagine for a moment that in the course of our fighting in Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden had been killed or captured. Would the war on terror have been over?

I have yet to meet a liberal who answered "yes."
-- Arnold Ahlert
Boca Raton, Florida

WORK STUDY
Re: Adam Creighton's Six Degrees of Preparation:

Creighton writes: "If six million full-time U.S. students were working rather than studying..."

As if our booming economy could absorb an extra six million (semi-literate) workers.

Page:   12 3 4   Last ›

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Taxes, Education, Trade, John McCain, Bill Clinton, Television, Religion, Islam, Abortion, Constitution, Law, Military, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, NATO, Africa, Oil

Comments

christian louboutin shoes| 9.8.09 @ 2:54AM

one day i went shopping outside ,and in an ed hardy store,I found some kinds of ed hardy i love most。they are: christian louboutin shoe boots christian louboutin shoe boots christian louboutin ankle boots christian louboutin ankle boots christian louboutin peep toe christian louboutin peep toe christian louboutin mary janes christian louboutin mary janes christian louboutin babel boots christian louboutin babel boots christian louboutin miss marple christian louboutin miss marple

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

Why Does Alyssa Milano Hate Me?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

In Sum, IPCC Discredited

Paul Chesser

* * * *

That Dangerous Radical . . . Marvin Olasky?

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Forget the Committees

Greg Scandlen

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT