Hung at dawn. Veep creep. Bad ads. Apologize to Nixon. Plus more.
(Page 2 of 7)
br>
—
Robert Randall
br>
Nashville, Tennessee
/p>
p>
I am watching the Media Mood Swings concerning John McCain. Mr.
Tyrrell states that Mr. McCain has to shore up the support of the
conservative base in the Republican Party. Maybe. I suspect that
one of the reasons Senator McCain emerged victorious in this
primary season is because his plain speaking appealed to many who
dislike that conservative base. To wit, I think McCain was correct
when he called Rush Limbaugh a “circus clown” and called Jerry
Falwell, Pat Robertson and, by extension, James Dobson “agents of
intolerance.” I applauded when he investigated the waste and
corruption of the Boeing Tanker lease deal. No, Mr. McCain doesn’t
need to shore up the conservative base. The conservative base needs
to start walking the talk. McCain can win in November with the help
of Independents, but he won’t get that support by pandering to a
clown, agents of intolerance and politicians who preach fiscal
responsibility and governmental efficiency and deliver the
opposite.
br>
—
Mike Roush
br>
North Carolina
/p>
p>
I find it rare indeed that I don’t share the bountiful exuberance
and optimism of Brother Tyrrell. His concluding query in today’s
column though, provokes one of those infrequent moments. He asks
“What kind of conservative…” would disdain Mr. McCain and thus
open the fetid possibility of an Obama or Clinton election. Well,
the kind that is offended by Mr. McCain’s backstabbing and
consistently shabby treatment of truer conservatives. The kind who
adheres far more consistently to conservative principles than does
he, the kind that dislikes him as much as he dislikes us. That kind
and I’m just warming up. Don’t misinterpret this screed — I quiver
at the thought of the bilious Hillary and the utterly vacant Obama
winning anything, but just because choices one and two are awful
doesn’t perforce make number three any more savory. Prove it Mr.
McCain.
br>
—
James C. Eaton
br>
Chetek, Wisconsin
/p>
p>
When McCain sat down with the journalists and editors in Des
Moines, one of them asked, "Have you always been covered for
health care by a taxpayers' financed health care plan?" He seemed
genuinely stumped by that and didn't seem to have any response
except, "That's an interesting statement."
[You can see this on YouTube at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nskNRlx0A7Y&NR=1]
The answer is: Of course he has, ever since he was a child. He
has taken advantage of the government's administered health plan
for over two decades in the Senate, without complaint about it
that I know of, and he will also receive a government invested
and administered pension plan when he retires. Both are prized by
their recipients, by the way. Isn't it hypocritical for any
candidate to take advantage of these two socialistic programs,
yet call for deregulation and free markets?
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause
and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress
impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist
surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our
culture.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it,
makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so
many people seem to be hostile to it?
OCPatriot| 10.21.08 @ 5:35PM
When McCain sat down with the journalists and editors in Des Moines, one of them asked, "Have you always been covered for health care by a taxpayers' financed health care plan?" He seemed genuinely stumped by that and didn't seem to have any response except, "That's an interesting statement."
[You can see this on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nskNRlx0A7Y&NR=1]
The answer is: Of course he has, ever since he was a child. He has taken advantage of the government's administered health plan for over two decades in the Senate, without complaint about it that I know of, and he will also receive a government invested and administered pension plan when he retires. Both are prized by their recipients, by the way. Isn't it hypocritical for any candidate to take advantage of these two socialistic programs, yet call for deregulation and free markets?