BY GOD OR OPRAH
Re: Jeffrey Lord's An Open
Letter to Barack Obama:
Mr. Lord should not worry. God, or at least Oprah, will provide
those legal funds.
-- Kent J. Lyon
College Station, Texas
Mr. Lord is giving his denomination's leaders too much of a pass on the IRS flap regarding Barack Obama's speech before the group. While it would have been nice if Obama had declined to speak at the event, the ultimate responsibility lies with the leaders who allowed him to speak in the first place! It is their responsibility to safeguard the church from this type of situation, not the speaker's to save them from themselves. The church leadership knew the rules, or least should have, and they failed to do what was necessary to keep away from violating the law (as silly as it may be).
But I must agree that Mr. Obama and his staff do bear some
responsibility as well. This is his home denomination, and to do
anything that threatens the security of the church he calls home
for his own political ends should tell us all something abut Mr.
Obama. What it tells me is that he is just another self serving
politician, interested solely in his own political well being, all
else be damned!
-- Eric Edwards
Walnut Cove, North Carolina
I only have a few things to say to Mr. Lord, Rev. Thomas and Mr. Lynn (Rev. ha!). I think it is about time that the liberal side and especially something Barry Lynn is connected with get caught and investigated. Every 4 years the liberal Democrats break the rules and go into Black Church especially and campaign and get away with it. While good organizations like Focus on the Family get audited (come out clean). I hope they throw the book at Barry and Rev. Thomas and Senator Obama for their arrogance. They knew the rules and laws (come on). They just knew that they are liberal Democrats and above the law. Finally, please repeal the law. This is just plain wrong and unconstitutional.
Maybe it will take a large liberal Church like the UCC losing
its tax exempt status to change the law. I hope so.
-- Joseph D'Ambrosia
A timely topic that might "deal with" 3 birds at one time -- if
interest ignites -- the LBJ Law against free speech, Obama and also
Hillary who has given many a political speech in black churches. No
doubt Obama thought he would get the same "pass" that Hillary
always gets -- and Republicans never get. So the real question
should be: Why hasn't the IRS investigated the Clintons for the
same thing. Maybe if enough of the right politicians get fined, the
LBJ Law will magically disappear. That is one "change" that is
absolutely needed.
-- Leonard Ransil
Doesn't Mr. Lord (a good name for a servant of Christ) know that the new age messiah Barack Hussein Obama isn't bound by the rules of law or the Constitution like the rest of us insignificant human beings. In his mind and the eyes of his disciples he's above the law -- even the Law's of God. He's infallible. What Mr. Lord needs is the "audacity to hope for the promise of change" and quit looking for substance, character and integrity in Barack Hussein Obama.
Now that "public theologian" (as Christianity Today christened Obama) has twisted Jesus' Sermon on the Mount to mandate homosexual marriage I'm sure this vain "champion" of separation of church and state has puffed up his ego to the point that he believes he has the right to violate any law or Constitutional principle he arbitrarily chooses. One wonders how the "Obamanation of Desolation" will rewrite the Ten Commandments to make eliminating terrorists a "sin," but sanctify the infanticide of partial birth abortion?
A careful review of Obama's lightweight record (something the
Democrat mainstream media refuses to do) reveals that though meager
it is a series of "bonehead mistakes," deals with corrupt domestic
and foreign businessmen and taxpayer funded scams to fill his
pockets and boost his ego. An individual so narcissistic and
enamored with himself doesn't have the character or integrity to
rectify the grievous damage he has done to his church much less any
political errors. Mr. Lord is hoping against hope for a promise of
change by the man who says a lot, but still says nothing.
-- Michael Tomlinson
MOCK THE VOTE
Re: Russ Ferguson's Friending
the Vote:
Every four years we hear this: "Young people are wildly interested in this election." The Democrats always have thousands upon thousands so fired up they can hardly wait until November. The problem is that by November, these young people are just that: very young and have shot their wad. By November they are completely bored with the whole idea.
In the fall, it is too much trouble to get out of bed; too much
trouble to get to the polls; the lines are way too long to wait;
too much trouble to even be interested by November. So, to the nice
young man who wrote this article, my answer is, "We'll see."
-- Angie VanDaele
Phoenix, Arizona
I was working in political campaigns before I could vote. I stood on corners holding campaign signs, knocked on doors, handed out literature and manned phone banks while other teens were partying. So what? Every Presidential election the Democrats and their media toadies tout an energized youth vote that's going to sweep a dim Dem into the White House -- just ask President John Francois Kerry or the "prophet" of gloom and doom President Al Gore.
The hype is even bigger this year with the Democrats running a has-been First Lady and a mesmerizing wannabe guru. Even if the youth do vote I'm still not overly impressed if they're anything like the "living dead" for Obama. The really impressive youth in America are enlisted in the United States military -- the men and women Obama and Hillary want to stab in the back on behalf of Islamic extremists. America's young warriors are not kids, but brave adults defending the right of their out-of-shape and overweight peers to vote for the candidate for "change" -- Barack Obama.
NFL jerseys| 8.29.09 @ 3:17AM
It is a wonderful article: NFL jerseys,Photoshop CS2,ghd Hair Straightener,Adobe Photoshop CS4.