Corporate America has known it for years. Advertise to young people and they get excited and buy things. Lots of things. But until now that same mindset has failed to reach presidential campaigns.
Perhaps this is because young people have generally failed to get to the polls and vote. They watch MTV’s coverage of elections, they talk about voting, sometimes they even register to vote — but they fail to actually do it.
But something has changed. Suddenly campaigns are paying attention to young people and young people are paying attention to campaigns.
As Barack Obama put it, “We have young people who have never had a reason to participate until now.” Hillary Clinton is crowding young supporters on stage at her rallies, so they are standing behind her on television. She said on 60 Minutes that one of her goals is to “set some really big vision that young people can buy into.”
During Rudy Giuliani’s concession speech in Florida, he noted the heightened attention from the young. “You’ve participated in that process — particularly the young people here,” he said.
A new generation is just now becoming of voting age. A generation that is more well-connected and has more people its members consider their close friends than any generation before it. That makes this generation more valuable to campaigns than the young people of the past.
WHAT DOES THIS large circle of friends have to do with elections? Everything. Nothing influences and persuades a voter more than talking with someone they hold in confidence.
No amount of campaign money, advertising, or door-to-door canvassing can beat being convinced by someone you consider a friend. With more friends, there is more influence, and technology is making it easier to get excited about politics.
This is a generation in which one can consider him or herself to have hundreds of close friends. The technology that these young people have glommed on to has expanded their network of friends far beyond any generation before. Consequently, young people can create momentum among the young — quickly.
Social networking has allowed members of this generation to keep in touch with a large number of people, even after not seeing them for years. Elementary school classmates are suddenly reconnected, even though they go to different colleges across the country from one another.
Instant messaging allows the youth to talk to eight or nine of their friends at once — while surfing the Internet, doing homework, or social networking — allowing them to keep up with far more friends than phone calls could possibly allow.
They can text message a group of people on the fly, make a few cell phone calls, and have a social event planned in minutes, bringing together a number of people that may not know each other at the outset. Odds are, they will be friends by the end. This will be solidified by that facebook.com friend request that will come shortly after the first meeting.
THE UPSHOT IS that suddenly young people matter to politics, because they influence a large number of votes. What are they looking for in a candidate?
Not all young people are looking for the same thing. Every demographic that exists in America also exists among America’s youth, along with every political view and every opinion. But, controlling for everything else, some things do seem to prevail among young people.
Facebook.com, one of the most popular social networking sites, includes pages for candidates where users can indicate their support. Barack Obama had 533, 684 supporters upon writing this article, Hillary Clinton had 114,891, and John McCain had 61,746.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?