(Page 6 of 13)
1) They presumably have enough money already.
2) Love of money can make your life miserable (just look at the Beatles).
3) It might interfere with his ability to enjoy The Hobbit in movie form.
None of these strikes me as an argument you commonly see in the American Spectator.
p>Colebatch is confused on one other point. John Lennon was not killed by "wealth and celebrity." He was killed by Mark Chapman. br> -- Glen Hoffing br> Shamong, New Jersey /p>Another odd little person solemnly and earnestly entreating someone else to forego $150 million because (1) he thinks that person already has "enough" money; (2) contracts? We don't honor no stinkin' contracts!; and (3) after all, the important thing is that HE gets to see "The Hobbit"!
My youngest sister used to be a Fundamentalist Christian and repeat such twaddle sanctimoniously and sincerely...until she reaped the whirlwind of a bad marriage and heard that same sanctimonious twaddle directed at her instead of from her. She admitted that she did not realize how it sounded until it hit her right in the face.
p>Hal G. P. Colebatch might want to think about how he'd feel if it was HIS $150 million and HIS dishonored contract. br> -- Kate Shaw br> Hobbit Fan
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.