By Patrick J. Michaels on 2.5.08 @ 12:07AM
Antarctica is playing havoc with the global warming model.
The Washington Post recently ran a shocking
above-the-fold article warning us of "Escalating Ice Loss Found
in Antarctica." A new paper by Eric Rignot of NASA's Jet Propulsion
Laboratory shows a net loss of ice where most scientists thought
the opposite would occur.
The Post went full-bore with this one, spreading the
article on to an entire interior page. The piece ends by noting
that Rajenda Pachauri, head of the United Nations'
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is so concerned
that he's is personally going down to inspect the situation.
He should. Before he even gets to Antarctica, Pachauri is going
to see something even more surprising than Rignot's finding.
Despite a warming Southern Ocean, the amount of ice surrounding
Antarctica is now at the highest level ever measured for this time
of the year, since satellites first began to monitor it almost
thirty years ago. This represents a continuation of the record set
last winter (our summer).
Thanks to the miracles of modern technology, we can also look at
the departure from the average for ice mass in a given month. At
present, the coverage of ice surrounding Antarctica is almost
exactly two million square miles above where it is historically
supposed to be at this time of year. It's farther above normal than
it has ever been for any month in climatologic records. Around now,
because it's summer down there and the ice is headed towards its
annual low point, there should be about seven million square miles
of it. That means, as data in University of Illinois' web
publication Cryosphere Today shows, that there is nearly 30%
more ice down in Antarctica than usual for this time of the
year.
All of the IPCC's models of Antarctica in the 21st century
forecast a gain in ice, as a warmer surrounding ocean evaporates
more water, which subsequently falls in the form of snow when it
hits the continent. It's simply too cold for rain in Antarctica,
and it'll stay that way for a very long time.
Concerning Antarctica as a whole, the IPCC's new climate
compendium notes "the lack of warming reflected in atmospheric
temperatures averaged across the region." Other studies, such as
Peter Doran's in Nature in 2003, show actual cooling in
recent decades. (There is a small area of significant warming in
the peninsula that points towards South America, but this is less
than 2% of Antarctica's total land mass.)
There's brand new evidence, just published in mid-January in
Geophysical Research Letters, of a striking increase in
snowfall over that peninsula. The few snowfall records that are
available elsewhere in Antarctica show considerable variation from
decade to decade, so discriminating the "signal" of increased
snowfall caused by global warming from all the rest of the "noise"
may be very difficult indeed.
We see the same problem with hurricanes and global warming.
Their strength and numbers vary considerably from year to year.
2005 was the most active year ever measured in the Atlantic Basin,
while 2007 was one of the weakest in history. How do you find the
fingerprint of global warming amidst such variation?
So it's not warming up, and the snowfall data are equivocal, yet
the continent is experiencing a net loss of ice. How can this be,
and is it even important? The current hypothesis is that warmer
waters beneath the surface are somehow loosening the ice. That's
plausible, but again, there's precious little proof of it.
And further, the bottom line is that there is more ice than ever
surrounding Antarctica.
One of the tired tropes that reverberate throughout global
warming reporting is that inconvenient facts get left out. In this
case, it's blatant. Midway through the Post's page-long
article comes a statement that "these new findings come as the
Arctic is losing ice at a dramatic rate." Wouldn't that have been
an appropriate place to note that, despite a small recent loss of
ice from the Antarctic landmass, the ice field surrounding
Antarctica is now larger than ever measured?
topics:
Global Warming, United Nations