The popular show drops plenty of clues but, can you trust them?
(Page 2 of 2)
The real Richard Alpert, former Harvard partner to Timothy
Leary, represents using modern science to achieve religious
transcendence, and later, renaming himself Baba Ram Dass, going
straight for the religious transcendence.
The character Alpert is seemingly ageless. If his name is
meaningful, it could relate to the apparently religious mission of
his group -- the "Others" -- compared to the almost parodically
scientistic pre-crash Dharma Initiative that they seem to have
superseded.
ALL SUCH SPECULATION is hazardous, however, since Lost
almost asks not to be trusted. It loves season openings and closers
deliberately designed to confuse the viewer as to what he's seeing,
where and when.
Lost's constant use of the number "23" indicates a love
for the fiction of Robert Anton Wilson. The philosophical science
fiction novelist celebrated "guerrilla ontology" -- wild techniques
to make people question the nature of the reality they are
perceiving.
Despite all the political philosopher namedrops, Lost
doesn't show much of a functioning society, and definitive answers,
both narrative and philosophical, continue to slip away.
Ultimately, the show sells classic sociopolitical anxiety: the
world is mysterious and strange, with inexplicable forces that
might save your soul or might kill you, and you'll never know why;
scientific planners and religious fanatics alike have complicated
plans in which they use humans as pawns; the wealthy and powerful
pursue secret agendas that may either save or destroy us.
By naming characters after philosophers, Lost reminds
us that the conflicts of ideology, power, and social relationship
are timeless, perhaps "eternally recurring" -- like character
Desmond Hume's re-cycling through his own life, like the seeming
series of "powers" rising and falling on the island (from the
creators of the 4-toed statue to the Black Rock crew to
the "Hostiles" to Dharma to the "Others" to...?).
With its echoes of everything from Homer's The Odyssey
to O'Brien's Third Policeman, Lost's intricate
webs of meaning and suggestion make it not only an exciting example
of post-modern referential bricolage, but also the most significant
pop adventure tale of our time.
Even in a "state of nature" on the island, its flashback-strewn
storytelling reminds us that none of us have a Lockean "blank
slate." Our past choices, failures, sins and obsessions will always
shadow and influence our present. Built the heart of the viewer's
relation to the show's mysteries is a faith that its writers, our
"leaders" -- the gods of the fictional universe we are watching --
are careful, caring, omniscient and omnipotent, that not a plot
thread or mysterious reference is dangled that they won't ravel
together with care.
We may be saps to believe it -- but Lost fans know that
attitude makes experiencing the show more delicious.