I’m an independent journalist and try to be neutral about these things, but I must admit I’m disappointed in Rudy Giuliani’s abrupt slide in the polls. Maybe it’s because I’m a fellow New Yorker, but I truly thought he was going to bring something more substantial to the table.
So here’s a bit of unsolicited advice to the Giuliani campaign about how to get back in the ballgame.
STOP TALKING ABOUT 9/11!!!
Giuliani so far has been a one-note candidate. It’s gotten so bad that one editorial cartoon last week showed Rudy begging for money on the streets of New York while holding a sign, “Down to my last $9.11.” That says it all. Public perception is that twenty years from now, Giuliani will still be talking about September 11.
That’s exactly what you don’t want — especially in this election.
Let’s face it. Whether you’re for or against the effort in Iraq (and I’m for it), people are sick of this thing. We got into this five years ago and last week some high Iraqi official said he thought we’d have to stick around until 2018. Voters don’t want to be reminded of all this.
Of course that doesn’t mean we’re going to pull out immediately or in the near future when someone new gets elected. There is no “peace” candidate in this election in the fashion of George McGovern in 1972. Hillary is carefully hedging her bets and even Obama seems to understand that he’s not going to be able to cut and run. Any intelligent person knows that at this point pulling out abruptly would light a fuse that would blow up the whole Middle East.
AS FAR AS THIS election is concerned, however, people want to put September 11 behind them. That’s why Rudy is doing so poorly. 2008 is going to be a huge break with the past. It’s like Ronald Reagan’s election in 1980 — people will wake up on November 5 and find they are living in a different country.
I don’t know what the change is going to be, but that’s what people want. Obama has captured this first with his mantra of “Change.” Now everybody has picked it up. Hillary Clinton is “Ready for Change, Ready to Lead.” Mitt Romney says “Change Starts Here.” Where is Rudy? He’s still talking about 9/11.
By endlessly harping on the same subject, Rudy has become a bore. He’s like the high school quarterback who’s earned a reputation around town and gets invited to a few grown-up parties.
It’s fun to have him around for a while but when you realize he’s going to do nothing but stand around talking about his exploits, people start rolling their eyes. This kid isn’t ready for the big time.
Giuliani has exhausted his 9/11 capital. By failing to evolve, he’s made himself the candidate of the past.
What should Rudy talk about to change the subject? I’m only a reporter and I’m sure he’s got plenty of good material on his staff, but here’s my list of interests:
* America’s place in the world. It’s obviously time to start mending fences. We’ve gone it alone for the last six years but now it’s time to show we can play with others.
Global warming is an obvious place to start. I know it’s mostly hype, but the point is people believe there’s a problem so it’s time to address it. Nobody who signed the Kyoto Protocol is doing anything about it and we’re probably doing more after not having signed it. But do we have to isolate ourselves on everything?
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?