By Jay D. Homnick on 1.22.08 @ 12:06AM
President Bush's historic aside and Yad Vashem.
President Bush's recently completed sojourn in the Middle East
was of the variety that tends to leave the viewer speechless...or
at least, wordless. His continued embrace of the failed Road Map
approach to solving the Palestinian problem draws a shrug. His
notion that there is some point in negotiating with Mohammed Abbas,
who only controls half of the autonomous Palestinian territory,
gets a wince. His declaration that he anticipates a final deal
before the end of his term prompts a roll of the eyes. His use of
the word "occupation" to describe Israel's holding the West Bank,
won in a defensive war, evokes a grimace. His truckling to Saudi
Arabia to plead for lower oil prices elicits a scowl. What is there
to say?
Yet there were a few words uttered on that trip -- a scant few
words, a masterpiece of laconic understatement, a Coolidgean
exercise in pungent brevity, words uttered by the President himself
-- that rendered this sojourn memorable, even historic. Standing at
the Yad Vashem museum of the Holocaust on the outskirts of
Jerusalem, looking at aerial photographs of the Auschwitz
crematoria taken by U.S. Air Force pilots in 1944, Bush turned to
Condoleezza Rice and said: "We should have bombed it."
This admission was immediately paired up with a similar
assessment offered by George McGovern in an interview not long ago.
McGovern was one of those American pilots who flew over Auschwitz
to bomb oil rigs five miles away. He told his questioner: "God
forgive us this tragic miscalculation." So this awareness is now
bipartisan, an important adjective to append to historical verities
in today's culture.
Learning truth is always of value, even when it is a mere
abstract scanned through the prism of hindsight. More valuable
still is when lessons can be gleaned to affect real-life,
real-world, real-time decisions. Is there something to be learned
from our excessive reticence in times past?
The official reasons for not bombing the crematoria were
shifting and flimsy at best. Too many resources to expend for
targets without strategic importance. The real reason, deep down,
was that saving Jews made for bureaucratic annoyance. If they get
out of there they have to come here, which means all kinds of
paperwork, more headaches for every branch of government. Other
countries despised Jews, but our entrenched paper-pushers looked at
them as bums who called for too much bumf. How many people have
given their lives in history because one guy wanted their blood and
the other guy didn't want their boots tracking mud on his carpet?
On one side the banality of evil, on the other side the evil of
banality.
The more obvious message for our own times is that apathy is as
much the enemy as antipathy. The various excuses for inaction buy
the time the bad actors need to wreak their destruction. The price
of conscience, no less than liberty, is eternal vigilance. The
innocent need protection, and the "protector of Israel cannot nap,
cannot slumber." The genocide in Rwanda happened while Bill Clinton
dithered, and by the time he decided he should have done something
about it, it was over. He actually managed to look like a nice guy
by apologizing for standing by, but that was scant comfort for the
slain, piled in faceless heaps.
There is a subtler message here as well, one that is being
overlooked by President Bush and today's bureaucrats. Those nations
whose leaders and citizens are audacious enough to announce their
intent to destroy another people should be taken at their word. At
this very moment, the same Palestinians who are being championed by
the President's team as viable negotiation partners are officially
pledged to the elimination of the state of Israel from the map. The
Iranians, just a bit further up the road, are even louder in
promising to bring about that end.
If the blundering, purblind policy of pretending the
Palestinians are a civilized entity potentially amenable to a
two-state solution eventually leads to the annihilation of Israel,
the new Genocide Museum will be set up in Washington D.C. alongside
the Holocaust Museum. A beautiful scale model of the state, prior
to its decimation, will stand facing the entranceway. On Genocide
Memorial Day of 2058, President George Bush IV may well stand right
there, flanked by his advisors, looking at the aerial
reconnaissance photographs of the Iranian nuclear facilities, taken
by our satellites checking on the oil fields.
"We should have bombed it."
This was a meaningful, poignant statement by an American
President. Let us pray that it never be echoed by a successor
retrospectively examining some atrocity we enabled by our
apathy.
Jay D. Homnick, commentator and humorist, is a frequent
contributor to The American Spectator. He also writes
for Human Events.
topics:
Bill Clinton, Iran, Israel, Oil