By Philip Klein on 12.31.07 @ 12:09AM
Message to the Hawkeye State: Use it or lose it.
DES MOINES -- Every four years, politicians and the media swarm
this small Midwestern state and shower its voters with attention
and compliments, but very few people have the courage to admit the
simple truth: Iowans are largely apathetic about politics, and they
don't deserve the disproportionate influence they have in choosing
the leader of the free world.
The amount of access that the average Iowan has to presidential
candidates leading up to the caucuses is simply absurd. Last
Friday, Mike Huckabee spoke at the Pizza Ranch on Main Street in
Pella, Iowa, a quintessential small town in the southern part of
the state. Huckabee described the town as "one of those places
where you feel like you've moved back into the neighborhood where
Ozzie and Harriet could live."
While Huckabee was speaking on one side of Main Street, Fred
Thompson appeared at the Smokey Row Coffee House a few blocks away.
The next morning, Mitt Romney visited the same coffee shop, and
boasted that it wasn't his first visit to the lovely Dutch-settled
town with a population of 10,245.
At campaign stops, candidates from both parties say that Iowans
are doing a great service for democracy by vetting them for the
rest of the country.
"Boy, the folks of Iowa, you love politics don't you?" Romney
said in Pella. "You guys are just amazing. You really do the nation
a service by getting to know each of us, and learning about what we
believe, learning about our heart, and our character, and deciding
who ought to lead our nation."
At a rally in Des Moines on Sunday night, Barack Obama told the
crowd admiringly, "You've lifted the hood, you've kicked the tires,
you've taken all of the candidates out for a test run."
The media often echo this romanticized notion of Iowans as savvy
consumers who carefully evaluate candidates.
THE REALITY IS QUITE different. Even though candidates in both
parties will have together spent hundreds of days in the state and
doled out more than $30 million to air more than 50,000 television advertisements,
only one out of ten eligible Iowans is expected to participate in a
caucus on Thursday.
Even some of those who attend political events are not very
knowledgeable about the candidates or major issues. I spoke to one
man who told me that he thought Rudy Giuliani was "okay as
governor" and another who told me that he was undecided between
Huckabee and Romney, but he couldn't say what the attributes or
drawbacks were of either of them even though he had seen both
candidates speak within the prior 24-hour period. He also said he
didn't know what issues were important to him.
To be sure, there are Iowans who are closely following the
election, but they are small in number relative to the voting age
population, especially considering the amount of attention that is
heaped upon the state. The well-informed voters appear in news
accounts because reporters need tight, coherent quotes for their
stories. "I don't knows" and blank stares do not make for good copy
or television.
But the effect of filtering out uninformed voters is that it
doesn't provide Americans with a truly accurate picture of the
political process in Iowa.
One of the obstacles to Iowans' learning more about the issues
is that much of the focus is on who spent how much time in the
state. One Huckabee supporter told me he couldn't support Fred
Thompson because he hasn't spent enough time in Iowa. The fact that
Thompson has been virtually camping out in the state for the past
few weeks was too little, too late, evidently.
The Des Moines station KCCI opened its newscast on Saturday
night following the New England Patriots game with a series of
reports on candidates touring the state. The brief segment on
Giuliani's visit didn't report on what he spoke about. Rather, it
was an opportunity for the newscaster to remind viewers several
times that Giuliani was leaving the state and would not return.
When candidates do show up, they are often greeted with shrugs
by jaded Iowans. On Saturday, the Ottumwa Courier ran
stories on visits by Huckabee and Thompson -- on page A7. The
front-page local news included a story on a snowstorm and another
headline:
"Cardboard ban officially goes into effect beginning
Tuesday."
IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE that voters would want to know that
candidates care about them enough to visit and work hard for their
votes, but Iowans are so spoiled by all the attention given to
them, that it has gone to their heads.
Before the Romney event in Pella, I was minding my own business,
tape recorder and notebook in hand, waiting for the candidate to
make his way through the crowd and begin his speech. A grinning
young attendee noticed me and taunted, "I bet I get to interview
him before you do!"
In offering an idealized portrait of Iowans (and out of fear of
being seen as elitist), political reporters will often talk about
how real Americans in Iowa have better things to do with
their lives than obsess over politics. These real
Americans would rather be watching the Orange Bowl on Thursday
night than voting. This patronizing attitude is unfair both to
Iowans and to the rest of America.
While it's easy to understand how the political process can turn
off voters, for all of the silliness that comes along with
campaigns, the bottom line is at the end of this crazy circus, one
person will emerge to become the most powerful leader in the
world.
The president will help guide tax and spending policy, appoint
justices to the Supreme Court who will make rulings for decades,
determine under what circumstances America uses military force, and
lead the nation through whatever crises may emerge in an uncertain
world.
Voters often complain that the media control the political
process, but Iowans have the unique opportunity to bypass the media
and see all of the candidates up close, and even ask them questions
directly. When next fall rolls around, many voters will complain
about the lack of alternatives to the two major candidates, but
because Iowa goes first, its voters have a chance to choose from a
wide pallet of candidates in both parties.
Iowa's status in presidential politics has real consequences.
Because a given candidate may be forced to drop out after Iowa,
voters in other states who may like that candidate will be denied
the ability to vote for him based on what Iowans decide. It also
prompts so-called small government Republicans to embrace farm
subsidies and Democrats to advocate increasingly protectionist
trade policies.
The power that Iowans exert over the selection of our president
would perhaps have some justification if voters here lived up to
the stereotype of being active and discerning. But if after all of
the time, money, and energy candidates have concentrated on the
state, nine out of ten voters stay home on caucus night, they will
not have kept their end of the bargain.
topics:
Trade, Barack Obama, Television, Business, Supreme Court, Military, Energy, Oil