YES TO DR. NO
Re: Shawn Macomber's Dr. No on
Ice:
My compliments to Shawn Macomber for a generally positive
article about Rep. Ron Paul (comments about Birchers aside). I
would merely suggest that Mr. Macomber misoverestimates the
"animosity" towards Dr. Paul in his own party. It is true that he
has attracted a lot of supporters who have never voted in a
Republican primary or caucus before. Heck, he is attracting people
who have never even thought about voting before! And while some
have booed Dr. Paul at Republican debates, others have cheered him.
Another Paul supporter scanned some of the leading conservative
blogs this morning, noticed that they were absolutely silent on
yesterday's $6 million Tea Party "moneybomb," and asked why
conservatives aren't talking about how to harness all the
enthusiasm and energy that Dr. Paul has inspired. Indeed -- why
not? If the Republican Party could welcome Reagan Democrats, why
not Ron Paul independents?
-- Catherine Windels
It is nice to see that good journalism is alive and well at the
Spectator. Shawn's article was well written and very fair
to Dr. Paul. We are definitely a passionate group and when you are
on a fixed income watching the pricing explosions in gas, food
prices you come to realize that things might just get out of
control. Also, imagine 35,000 of our troops in one of the most
financially sound countries on this planet for the past 55/57
years.
-- Thomas J. McArdle
Thank you for publishing a positive article on Dr. Paul.
With the way the mainstream media is promoting candidates for
"style," "likeability," and other superficial reasons, it is
refreshing to see that someone is reporting on Dr. Paul's
message.
-- Matt Thomas
"EVEN IF ONE WERE TO OVERLOOK the animosity towards Paul in the party whose nomination he is seeking, it's fairly clear the country is not ready to elect a strict constitutionalist so long as reporters continue to ask Paul questions like...well: 'What's it mean to be a Constitutionalist?' "
While I'm not a Ron Paul supporter, when I read something like
this, I just hang my head down and cry.
-- Mike Showalter
Austin, Texas
McCAIN'T CONSERVATIVE
Re: Jennifer Rubin's Five Steps
for McCain:
I am so tired of the DC pundits (that includes you, Jennifer)
telling us how John McCain can win. As long as there are
conservatives around who remember just how liberal he is, John
McCain will not be our nominee...
-- Judy Beumler
Louisville, Kentucky
John McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts.
John McCain spoke out against the Bush tax cuts.
John McCain predicted the Bush tax cuts would cause massive increases in the annual budget deficit and would hurt the economy. He was massively wrong!
Tax cuts are one of those issues that define what a conservative is. John McCain is not a conservative.
While I respect his prior service to this country, he represents
all that is wrong with congress and should be replaced. He is just
another unimpressive Senator running for President, for what
reasons, I'm still not sure. (Are presidential candidates allowed
to use their campaign contributions to maintain a lavish
lifestyle?)
-- Paul Hoffmann
San Antonio, Texas
McCain is in trouble because he is compassionate towards Democrats
and terrorist detainees but hard on Republicans. Much of the
Republicans' current woes can be traced back to McCain's
compassionate and compromising attitude towards Democrats and their
fellow travelers in GITMO. Let's not forget he seems to have been
more worried about securing al Qaeda detainees civil rights than
actually reelecting Republicans in 2006. A McCain Presidency would
have all the paranoia of a Nixon regarding fellow Republicans, but
none of the loyalty as shown by Reagan and both Bush Presidents.
Still if the choice is between a backstabbing McCain and a Democrat
I'll go with the backstabber over the traitor every time.
-- Michael Tomlinson
Jacksonville, North Carolina