The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Political Hay
Print Email
Text Size

Political Hay

JFK, Bush, and the Politics of Hate

Assailed in November 1963, hating the President is just fine today.

(Page 3 of 3)

"If the trespasser looked closer, however, he would be momentarily baffled. The memento of the happy time would be cleaned before storing. Obviously this (second) costume had not been. There are ugly splotches along the front and hem of the skirt....the inside of each shoe are caked dark red. And the stockings are quite odd...rusty clots have caked off....Examining them closely, the intruder would see his error. This clothing, he would perceive, had not been kept out of sentiment. He would realize that it had been worn by a slender young woman who had met with some dreadful accident. He might ponder whether she had survived. He might even wonder who had been to blame.
br> One looks back at William Manchester's descriptions of the Dallas of November 22, 1963. One looks now at the condition of the modern day American liberal movement as it stands on November 22, 2007. And it is impossible not to ponder Manchester's closing question exactly.

Who is to blame?

Page:   1 23

topics:
Television, Islam, Environment, Hollywood, Constitution, Supreme Court, Israel, NATO, Oil

About the Author

Jeffrey Lord is a former Reagan White House political director and author. He writes from Pennsylvania at jlpa1@aol.com.

Letter to the Editor View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

T G.| 3.8.10 @ 11:14AM

How can anyone begin to compare JFK to George W. Bush? Because I just don't believe for a moment the analogy that JFK's starchy vowels and personal wealth make any kind of valid comparison to George's W. Bush's Texas drawl and personal wealth. It's like making cartoon analogies between the good and the bad guys. With the bad guys dressed in black capes with shifty mustaches and the good guys always dressed in white. Therefore, JFK and George W. Bush must be literal counterparts by these analogies.
But we know those analogies are just symbols. And in the real world people can be of all shapes, sizes, and colors and still be good, bad, or indifferent. So therefore, in the case of George W. Bush and JFK , I believe most people will ultimately judge their presidencies but what they've done. Despite any political prejudices on their part.
And furthermore, we know the people of Dallas pretty much gave JFK a very warm welcome in spite of any right wing ill will. And in the case of George W. Bush at his last Iraqi press conference we know he wasn't getting a warm welcome because an Iraqi reporter threw a shoe at his face. From a country that he supposedly liberated. Which are not analogies but actual events.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Jeffrey Lord

More Articles From Political Hay

http://spectator.org/archives/2007/11/20/jfk-bush-and-the-politics-of-h

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT