By Eric Peters on 11.6.07 @ 12:07AM
When gas was cheap cars got smaller; now that it's ultra-expensive, Detroit is making them bigger than ever. Go figure.
Here's an irony for you:
In the 1980s, as gasoline got cheaper, American
automakers downsized their fleets -- switching from
heavier and rear-wheel-drive to lighter and front-wheel-drive.
V-8s, if they were allowed at all, got small; 5.7 liters was about
as big as it got. Most cars came with fours or sixes. It was the
way of the future.
Now, gas is expensive -- almost twice what it was circa
'86, in fact. And American automakers have responded with
ever-bigger, ever-heavier cars. Rear-wheel-drive and V-8s are back,
big time.
But just a bit too late, probably.
Oil is getting close to $100 per barrel -- and $4 per gallon
regular unleaded might be just around the next corner. If the
winter's unusually harsh; if things go sour with Iran. A late
season hurricane.
Any one of several possibilities.
Things could get really ugly, really fast. American automakers
still rely on large trucks and SUVs to bring home the bacon. And
they've invested hugely in brand-new rear-wheel-drive passenger car
platforms -- especially GM. There's a new Camaro on the way; also
several new RWD sedans -- with hunky V-8s in them, too.
These are big-draw cars, no doubt. People love power, size and
style. It's understandable. It's what made the 1950s and the '60s
sizzle. And it's why the under-powered, under-sized '70s and '80s
sucked. Efficiency is rarely exciting. Sit under one of those
god-awful compact fluorescent light bulbs, if you need a refresher.
They make your skin look like a three-day-old corpse on an
embalming table. It's a harsh price to pay for a couple of
kilowatts. So also driving a Ford Festiva, Geo Metro or Diahatsu
Charade.
But they did get nearly 40 mpg -- and that matters when
gas doubles in price overnight.
THE CANARY IN THE COAL MINE may just be Toyota's clunky-looking
(but 50 mpg capable) Prius hybrid. It is the only passenger car out
there that's basking in the warm glow of double-digit upticks in
sales. And it's not that it's a Toyota -- though that may help
some. For proof, look at the performance of some other Toyotas --
like the new Tundra full-size truck -- which aren't nearly as in
the pink. Then check out the stats on other, similar models --
imported and domestic. The numbers are down -- even as size and
weight have ballooned to historic proportions and available engines
now routinely top 6 liters and deliver 300-plus horsepower.
It's not hard to figure why this is.
The middle class constitutes the bulk of the market for new
cars. Depending on whose numbers you go by, the average middle
class income is in the $50k range -- for a family. You could notch
this up a little to say $80k or so and that would include virtually
everyone in the country who isn't among the very top income earners
(less than 10 percent of the entire country) or the "working poor "
(people with family incomes under $30k annually) and the outright
poor (those below the federal poverty line -- and they're not
buying new cars anyhow).
Okay. Most of these middle-income types can't afford to buy a
new car outright; they finance the thing -- and it's usually a
pretty big-ticket item for their family budgets. The cost of fuel
is not something they can ignore.
Now let's have a look at some of the latest offerings:
That new 2008 Pontiac G8 GT is mighty tempting -- like
an Angus Thickburger at Hardees. Six liter V-8, 361 horses. Rear
wheel drive. Ah, yes! But then, there's that 19 gallon tank to
fill. And it will need filling often. Tentative estimates for the
V-8 GT are 15 mpg city, 23 highway. (The V-6 version of the G8's
not much of an improvement; 17 city, 24 highway.) For a huge V-8
pushing 400 horses, 24 mpg on the highway is actually damn good.
It's easily 10 mpg better than a typical muscle car of similar
output from the '60s.
But relative efficiency isn't the same thing as
efficient.
At current prices (around $3 per gallon, depending on where you
live), tanking up the V-8 G8 GT will cost you about $60. And that
tankful will last the typical commuter less than a week -- so
figure at least four fill-ups per month, or $240 bucks.
For many middleclass types, that's a lot to swing -- at
current prices. A little runabout like the Prius (or one
of the new "B" econo-subcompacts like the Honda Fit) may not make
you feel all that spectacular when you stomp the gas -- but it
costs less than half to feed the thing. The tank's smaller --
around 14 gallons is typical -- and the car itself can go 30-40
percent farther on a gallon of fuel.
Thirty dollars to fill up vs. $60. And maybe only three fill-ups
per month vs. four (or even five).
Money matters. It's the speed bump in the road that forces us to
slow down -- whether we want to or not.
We have no choice.
It's why we shop at Wal-Mart and Costco. And it's why we're
snapping up high-efficiency cars like the Prius -- and saying "uh,
no thanks" to big hogs we can't afford.
Muscle sleds -- and big RWD sedans and wagons -- worked in the
'50s and '60s because they were cheap to feed. (Average Americans
also had more disposable income.) When they suddenly became not
cheap to feed in the early '70s, love turned to loathing. The
divorce papers were filed. We -- most Americans, that is -- signed
up for "sensible shoes" that took the form of smaller, lighter
cars. GM, Ford and Chrysler went on crash diets. Almost overnight,
RWD became an acronym for out-of-date dinosaur. The future was FWD
-- and "cab forward."
Remember?
Now the circle's about to close again. The automakers have
re-tooled and revamped their lineups and are once again building
huge, powerful, flashy things the likes of which we haven't seen en
masse since 1967 or thereabouts.
But the problem is it's 2007 -- and cheap gas is
alreadygone. We don't even get a grace period -- let alone
a few years to have our fling. At just the moment that this
latter-day Renaissance of freewheeling excess is really getting
started, the reality check's been mailed -- post-dated.
Much as we might love the idea, signing up for a 23 mpg G8 (or
even a 28 mpg '09 Camaro) in these days seems about as sensible as
an adjustable-rate loan on an overpriced Las Vegas McMansion. A
"great room" with 15 foot high ceilings doesn't do you much good if
you can't afford to heat it in winter. Just like a 361 horsepower
muscle sedan gets to be not-so-fun when the SOB's bleeding you
white every week.
Maybe we'll discover that half a mile under L.A. sits more oil
than in all of Saudi Arabia. That would be wonderful. But odds are,
we won't. Odds are, the price of fuel's going to keep on going
up.
And the appeal of big cars with big V-8s is going to go
down.
It's not something I look forward to. But it is something I
expect.
topics:
Iran, Oil