By Patrick J. Michaels on 10.29.07 @ 12:07AM
Only a desert rat would blame California's mega-fires on global warming.
Blame California's mega-fires on global warming. Or at least
that's what Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said last week
in the Hill.
Global warming affords endless opportunities to test glib
hypotheses by politicians who have no training whatsoever in fields
of which they claim pontifical knowledge. And Reid's statement is
easy to test.
By the end of each and every summer, Southern California is
drier than the world's best martini. A couple weeks ago, I took a
drive up San Gabriel Canyon, an arroyo typical of the mountains
surrounding the Los Angeles basin. The steep hillsides were studded
with crackling-dry vegetation, and it was obvious that the area was
sitting on the precipice of a massive fire season.
California's big wildfires are, ironically, caused by excessive
winter rains. Normally, the region that's been ablaze averages
about a foot from December through March. Owing to the fact that
just about every day after the rainy season is warm and sunny, it's
only a matter of a month or two before the surface dries out to the
point that there's not enough water to support additional plant
growth. The more it rains in the winter, the more vegetation grows,
and the more there is to burn in the summer, which is invariably
hot and dry.
The distribution of rainfall between years is a bit unusual. The
vast majority of the years have below normal precipitation -- about
four or so inches below the average of a bit over a foot, as shown
in our attached graph. In the fewer years that are above average,
when it rains, it pours, with rainfall often 100% (one foot or
more) above the mean.
Some of the very wet years are caused by El Nino, a reversal of
winds over the Pacific Ocean that has been going on every few years
ever since there was a Pacific Ocean. People like Senator Reid (and
Vice President Gore) will cite computer models predicting that El
Ninos should become stronger or more frequent with global warming,
but there are an awful lot of other models showing that they won't
change or that they might even lessen in frequency. The Nobel
Prize-winning United Nations Intergovermental Panel on Climate
Change says "There is no consistent indication of discernible
future changes in ENSO [an acronym for El Nino] amplitude and
frequency."
When things get very wet, there's plenty more time for the soil
to remain moist, producing a much longer growing season in the
hills where suburbs and very expensive homes are proliferating. The
problem is that these rooms-with-a-view are also
houses-with-a-risk; i.e., they're in the path of wildfires. Rain
adds fuel to the fire, by bulking up the vegetation mass.
If Senator Reid is right, then rainfall, or the frequency of
rainy years, must be increasing in the fire zone. Here is the total December-March precipitation for the
California South Coast Drainage Climatological Division from 1895
through 2007. Data are from the National Climatic Data Center, a
part of the U.S Department of Commerce.
What's noted in the graph is pretty obvious. Most of the years
are below the long-term average of about 12 inches, but the
relatively few that are above the mean are often way above it. If
global warming is causing the increase in Southern California
wildfires, then the frequency of very wet years has to be
increasing in a significant fashion, because excessive moisture is
required to create excessive vegetation.
Obviously it is not. In fact, the biggest agglomeration of far
above-normal years was a 12-year period beginning in 1905.
Ironically it was these rains that prompted some of the massive
westward migration of U.S. population, as both California and
Arizona were touted as green paradises, which they were, thanks to
all that vegetation. Sure, there were wildfires then, but very few
people lived within their reach.
Now that the paradise of the Los Angeles Basin is home to so
many more people, whenever we have a very wet year (2005 being the
last big one), it's only a matter of time before thousands of homes
get torched.
But don't blame this on global warming. There's no trend
whatsoever in the frequency of heavy-rainfall years that would
promote wildfires. And our officials should especially avoid making
untested statements on global warming to papers like the
Hill, which other Senators and Congressmen accept as
gospel.
topics:
Harry Reid, Global Warming, United Nations, NATO, Oil