(Page 6 of 18)
p> It seems to me there are at least 3 things wrong with Mr. Lord's scenario. #1) She ain't no lady, #2) Without control of the House or Senate how will the suddenly outraged Republicans get anywhere with demanding investigations, and #3) There will be her SCOTUS picks breaking new ground with confirmation votes that are along party lines and to heck with suggesting they should have had 80-90 votes at least. I do however agree with Mr. Lord there will be at least a small group, 25-35% of Republicans that won't participate in a honeymoon, the only surprise will be which ones will. br> -- Roger Ross /p>Come on TAS. This column is drivel. Oh boy. The Republicans and Rush Limbaugh are going to be tough on Hillary if she wins. That is news?! And what is Mr. Lord's point? What is this -- the political equivalent to a 2 year-old holding its breath when the rattle is taken away?
The GOP who followed GWB over the cliff is going to be a rowdy bunch no matter which Democrat wins the White House (assuming the Dems actually win it).
The GOP -- the party of personal responsibility -- will whine and complain about how rude the Dems have been to poor old GWB. Well, how did the GOP treat Bill Clinton? They impeached him for a BJ and that guy didn't start a false and failed war, run up deficits or endorse torture and renditions with a nod and a wink.
p>If Hillary does win, as many GOP supporters like to say to liberals in the past 'Get over it'. Go ahead Mr. Lord, hold your breath till you turn blue, you have only yourselves to blame. br> -- John Jordan br> Ramsey, New Jersey /p>Jeffrey, Jeffrey, Jeffrey! What you been smokin' son?
There ain't a Republican in sight with the spheres to do what you suggest. Republicans don't have what it takes to get down and dirty like the Democrats.
p>But, I guess we can dream, can't we?