(Page 6 of 10)
Nice effort, Jennifer, but scratching the surface at best, I'm sure. Back in 1992, when Bubba was running, Rush pulled one of those "I've changed my mind" gotchas and had a few callers convinced that he was actually going to support Billy. After coming clean, he mentioned that if Clinton were elected we would see just how ugly the true face of liberalism was. He was, we did, and still we're having to face the possibility of going through it all over again, only worse. Just as President Bush described the GWOT as unlike any war we have ever fought, the election of HRC would be unlike any nightmarish Presidency we have ever had to endure. Sure there's SCOTUS appointments, HillaryCare, etc. But, what about adding this to your list of policy changes she is likely to promote, the establishment of 'children's rights', remember her work with UNICEF? And, instead of bringing back the WH china, it'll be China in the WH. Kucinich would be a picnic.
Hmm, maybe she'll even interest Sarkozy in buying back the Louisiana Purchase. You know, give the remaining states a little buffer from the Spanish land grant claimants! Heck, I wouldn't mind moving back to Virginia.
p>Then, perhaps, with regard to Hillary, this is all for naught. It could be even WORSE! Recently, during a restaurant break, I saw a Gore/Obama 2008 bumper sticker. But, what's more, it was on a gas guzzlin', CO2 pollutin' SUV (Nissan Pathfinder) driven by a pharmacy technician I knew. So, go figure. There's your voting public. About says it all, eh? br> -- Mike Showalter br> Austin, Texas /p> p> THE RIGHTWING REVOLUTION br> Re: Jeffrey Lord's The Goldwater-Reagan Victory : /p> p>Mr. Lord, you just said it all and made our spirits soar. Thank you! br> --
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.