The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Firing Up Fred

Beefs about where's the beef? Also: Vietnam and Iraq -- facts and figures. Mao and opium addicts. Punk musicality. Plus more.

(Page 4 of 12)

br> Re: William Tucker's The Real Lesson of Vietnam : /p>

America has exactly the same problem in Iraq as it did in Vietnam -- it can't define what exactly winning means and how the public will recognize it. Until this happens, forget about getting the support of the home front and the Rosie the Riveters who helped win World War 2. In that war, victory was unmistakable -- the Russians had stormed Berlin and planted their flag on the Brandenburg Gate, Hitler was a pile of ashes, every Japanese city had been burnt to the ground and the Japanese had surrendered on the decks of the USS Missouri. Victory was unmistakable even to those who lost. There was no equivalent in Vietnam and no one has even tried to say what winning in Iraq looks like. It is the worst display of utterly incompetent war leadership imaginable.

p>The American people, faced with a war in Iraq that they don't understand and that has never been explained to them, are simply doing what most people do when dealing with untrustworthy politicians and unproven products -- they want to see the money first. It is a criminal failure of leadership of the worst sort that the Bush administration and the congress expect them to do otherwise. Do they really think that their own people are that stupid? It sure looks like it. Until the President and the congress begin to show even the faintest understanding of what war fighting and war leadership requires then everyone except the Islamists and the terrorists can forget about winning in Iraq. They will win simply because we aren't bothering to even try, we can't even say what the hell we are doing over there. br> -- Christopher Holland br> Canberra, Australia /p>

William Tucker was somewhat careless with his facts in "The Real Lesson of Vietnam," published October 4.

Some of the problems are minor details, as when Tucker writes that General Creighton Adams was appointed by President Richard Nixon to command the U.S. forces in Vietnam. The general's name was Abrams, and he was appointed by President Lyndon Johnson well before the election that made Nixon president.

p>Others are more important, as when Tucker writes, "By 1971, an entire American division was living in villages in the Mekong Delta." This is so untrue that I cannot even figure out what might have led Tucker br> to this error. /p>
Page: ‹ First   2 34 5 6   Last ›

topics:
Bill Clinton, Sports, Islam, Environment, Books, Hollywood, Movies, Military, Iraq, Russia, Oil

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2007/10/05/firing-up-fred

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT