By Philip Klein on 9.14.07 @ 12:08AM
Rudy Giuliani's personal connection to Sept. 11 and the temptation to move on.
Rudy Giuliani's decision to participate in the Sept. 11
commemoration ceremony at Ground Zero on Tuesday generated
controversy in all of the familiar places, with the New York
Times preemptively editorializing that "the families' pain
should not be a backdrop for a campaign commercial."
Even though the former mayor, who received widespread praise for
his leadership on Sept. 11, had participated in every ceremony at
Ground Zero since the fateful day, critics argued that simply
because he was now running for president, he should decline an
invitation to appear.
In the end, the remarks Giuliani delivered at the ceremony were brief
and far from political. "On this day six years ago, and on the days
that followed, in the midst of our great grief and turmoil, we also
witnessed uncompromising strength and resilience as a people," he
said. "It was a day with no answers, but with an unending line of
those who came forward to try to help one another." He followed
with a quote from Elie Wiesel.
Giuliani's presence at the ceremony was far less controversial
among the general public than it was in the media. A USA
Today/Gallup poll found that 92 percent of Americans believed it
was appropriate for Giuliani to participate.
But the debate over his appearance raised questions about what
role Sept. 11 should play in Giuliani's candidacy and what
implications his direct connection to the Sept. 11 attacks has on
the way he sees the world.
Liberal blogger and anti-Giuliani crusader Greg Sargent has
attacked Giuliani repeatedly for "naked
opportunism around 9/11." But this tactic is nothing new to
liberals who seek to portray any mention of Sept. 11 by a
Republican as evidence that the party is exploiting a tragedy.
The same criticisms were made in 2004, when the Republican
National Convention was held in New York City. At the time,
Giuliani defended the location of the convention, as well as making
Sept. 11 an issue in the campaign. He told the New York
Times that the terrorist attack was ''the single most
significant event that has happened in the last four years, and is
maybe one of the most important events in our history....So it has
to be an issue in the election. Not discussing it would be like
conducting an election for Abraham Lincoln and not discussing the
Civil War.''
Giuliani has spent months talking about his record fighting
crime, cutting taxes, and slashing welfare rolls as mayor of New
York City and he has rolled out a list of 12 Commitments that
include policy proposals on health care, spending, and energy.
Despite this, many people still have the impression that he is
running purely on Sept. 11, because that is how most Americans know
him, and because he continues to argue that terrorism is the
defining issue of this campaign.
Liberals clearly have an interest in changing the image
Americans have of Giuliani as a strong leader during crisis because
his high favorability ratings make him a threat in
the general election. But beyond that, liberals benefit from an
environment in which discussing the tragedy is seen as off limits.
Giuliani irritates them because he is unapologetic about bringing
up the issue.
"If we don't talk about Sept. 11, you can't prepare to try to
avoid another Sept. 11," he said last week.
If there's one thing that Giuliani conveys when speaking about
terrorism and Sept. 11 it is: it's personal.
"I was there when it happened, and I've been there every year
since then," he said last week in Florida when defending his
decision to attend Tuesday's ceremony. "If I didn't, it would be
extremely unusual. As a personal matter, I wouldn't be able to live
with myself."
In an interview with the New York Times's
Matt Bai, Giuliani, who lost friends in the attacks, said, "I
guarantee you, there's nobody in this country who wants to catch
Bin Laden more than I do....And it is personal." In his book
Leadership, Giuliani recalls telling President Bush three
days after Sept. 11, "If you catch this guy Bin Laden, I would like
to be the one to execute him."
The emotion that Giuliani has over Sept. 11 was on full display
in the presidential debate earlier this year when he responded with
visceral anger to Ron Paul's suggestion that American foreign
policy was to blame for the attacks.
One question voters will have to ask themselves when evaluating
Giuliani as a presidential candidate is whether his personal
connection to Sept. 11 is a good thing or a bad thing.
Many of Giuliani's critics have argued that his focus on Sept.
11 has distorted his perception of the world, making him have an
exaggerated view of the terrorist threat, and preventing him from
seeing Islamic terrorism as one of many national security
challenges America faces. His selection of neoconservative icon
Norman Podhoretz as a foreign policy adviser raised fears among
critics that a President Giuliani would be eager to bomb Iran.
Andrew Sullivan has accused Giuliani of "9/12 extremism" -- an
insinuation that the former mayor is stuck in the mindset that
dominated the emotionally charged environment in the immediate
aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, and thus incapable of making
rational foreign policy decisions.
But for those who do believe that the struggle against Islamic
terrorism is the defining issue of our times, Giuliani's personal
connection to the tragic event should be seen as a plus. One of the
dangerous possibilities in this ongoing war is that the further
removed we are from Sept. 11th, the more temptation there will be
to move on, and the more people will argue that the threat of
terrorism is not that big of a deal.
The intellectual groundwork for this point of view was laid last
year when political science professor John Mueller wrote
Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate
National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them, in which
he argued the threat of terrorism has been greatly exaggerated.
The general narrative that America needs to get beyond 9/11 is
consistently pushed in the media. A New York magazine
article on Giuliani written earlier this year
matter-of-factly declared, "Except for those who have a personal
connection to the tragedy, people have generally moved on." As the
sixth anniversary of the event approached, the media were running
stories on so-called "9/11 fatigue," and seeking out people who
would lament the fact that we are still grieving the tragedy after
all these years. But Giuliani had a different perspective.
"For me every day is an anniversary of Sept. 11," Giuliani said
in St. Petersburg last week.
Obviously, Giuliani's personal connection to Sept. 11 shouldn't
be the sole argument in support of his candidacy, but the crucial
challenge for the next president will be to make sure America
remains vigilant in fighting terrorism. The graphic images of the
carnage of Sept. 11 will always be seared into Giuliani's memory,
and he is unlikely to let short-term fluctuations in polls or petty
political controversies cloud his view of the bigger picture.
topics:
Taxes, Foreign Policy, Health Care, Islam, Environment, Iran, Energy, Oil