(Page 2 of 3)
/p> blockquote>1) Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change. br> 2) Islam is seen as separate and 'other'. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them. br> 3) Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist. br> 4) Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a 'clash of civilisations'. br> 5) Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage. br> 6) Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand. br> 7) Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society. br> 8) Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal. /blockquote> br> Clearly none of these accusations are racist -- indeed, no particular races are mentioned -- and most are either antithetical ("Hostility toward Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices toward Muslims") or self-evidently true, e.g., the charge that Islam is a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage. The commissioners for some reason deny this, apparently unaware that Islam's founder was an eminent military and political leader. Similarly the suggestion that Islam is not a monolithic bloc was refuted during the Danish cartoon kerfuffle when Muslims from all nations and sects came together as one to denounce the publication of editorial cartoons depicting Le Prophete Mahomet .Another of the preceding sub-definitions (e.g., that "Islam is seen as inferior to the West") stupidly contrasts a specific religion with a geopolitical, historical and cultural entity. Perhaps the commissioners meant to say that the Middle East is seen as inferior to the West, or Islam is seen as inferior to Christianity or secularism? Whatever the Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia meant it was unable to articulate it, which is not surprising considering its finished product. As for Islam being a barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist religion, what else would one call the traditions of forced marriage, the stoning of gays, genital mutilation, the murder of apostates, etc., etc.?
THE CHARGE OF Islamophobia invariably sends the government and police into a panic. This summer the Islamic Human Rights Commission accused British TV network Channel 4 with "Islamophobia" and stirring up racial hatred after it broadcast a documentary titled Undercover Mosque. In the film an investigative journalist secretly recorded the strange goings on at the Green Lane mosque in Birmingham, England, including fanatical imams condemning democracy, opposing integration, and praising the Taliban for killing coalition troops.
Pingback| 2.4.09 @ 7:12PM
You have GOT to be Frickin’ Kidding Me! - UK Police Adopt Hijab Uniform links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 2.25.09 @ 6:18PM
Bosnian Serbs ordered to pay $41.8 million to rebuild mosques links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.7.09 @ 5:07AM
Palestine, Kosovo, and the Third Islamic Invasion » Winds Of Jihad links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.30.09 @ 10:09AM
Trained In Pakistan–While Our Qualified NHS Nurses Have To Ship Out–muslim leaves dyi links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 8.24.09 @ 7:04AM
What Compassion Can Brownski Be Speaking Of_Attacks On Wife and Hubby_ Or The Priest? links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Acharya S| 11.29.09 @ 8:42PM
Please see my articles:
"Islam is not a race"
http://www.faithfreedom.org/content/islam-not-race
"Death to Islamophobes!"
http://www.faithfreedom.org/is.....lamophobes