By W. James Antle, III on 8.27.07 @ 12:08AM
Lincoln Chafee's conservative primary challenger wonders why his party favored a Rockefeller Republican over a Reaganite.
In the long list of Republican regrets about the 2006 elections,
there is undoubtedly an entry for Sen. Lincoln Chafee. All told,
the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) and other
edifices of the national party spent over $1 million to drag
Chafee, the most liberal Republican senator, across the finish line
in a competitive GOP primary. Once Chafee was renominated, 94
percent of Rhode Island Republicans voted for him in the general
election even though his positions on most issues were
indistinguishable from those of his Democratic opponent.
Chafee lost the election anyway, since Republicans only
represented about 18 percent of the electorate in the heavily
Democratic Ocean State. And he didn't seem particularly grateful
for his party's support. Two days after the election, he told
reporters he was unsure of whether he would remain a Republican.
When asked if he thought his defeat might have helped the country
by turning the Senate over to the Democrats, he replied, "To be
honest, yes." Chafee then hinted that the only reason he hadn't
switched parties before the election was that his GOP affiliation
helped him bring home federal dollars to Rhode Island.
Most people have since forgotten about the ingratitude of Rhode
Island's forgettable former senator. But Steve Laffey, the
man who tried to unseat him in last year's Republican primary,
still remembers. The two-term Cranston mayor has even written a
book, Primary Mistake: How the Washington
Republican Establishment Lost Everything in 2006 (and Sabotaged My
Senatorial Campaign), to remind everyone else.
The subtitle says it all as far as the book's thesis is
concerned, but it doesn't begin to describe the color with which
Laffey tells his story. In keeping with the jokes about his
surname, Laffey is a pretty funny guy. His sense of humor comes in
handy, because without it his tome might be defined by sour
grapes.
A good portion of Primary Mistake is devoted to Laffey
coming to terms with why, as an American citizen who met the
constitutional requirements to serve in the Senate, people kept
telling him he couldn't run. He recalls getting similar treatment
when he first decided to run for mayor of Cranston: The party
establishment told him he couldn't run because they already had a
candidate. A successful businessman before going into politics,
Laffey looked at the Cranston party elders the way he looked at his
"three-year-old daughter, Audrey, when she throws all the shampoo
bottles in the toilet" and said would spend a quarter of a million
dollars of his own money to win the nomination. According to
Laffey, the man GOP leaders had picked to be the nominee responded
by bursting into tears and withdrawing from the race.
Laffey had no such luck with Lincoln Chafee and the Republican
leaders in Washington. He recalls meetings with Elizabeth Dole's
NRSC staff where they told him he could do whatever he wanted, but
they were not going to support him. Based on Chafee's liberal
record, Laffey seems almost perplexed by this decision:
When I ran for reelection as the mayor of Cranston,
there was an Independent candidate running whose only claim to fame
was that he wanted to keep a thirty-five-foot inflatable gorilla in
his backyard. (Talk about a single-issue candidate!) He was
endearingly referred to as Gorilla Man. I never thought to say,
"Why is Gorilla Man running?" When the debates were scheduled, I
showed up and debated him along with the Democratic candidate...
This is America. Even Gorilla Man can run and get 4 percent of
the vote.
Laffey is no Gorilla Man. He was twice elected mayor of an
overwhelmingly Democratic city, winning a second term by a
landslide margin. Throughout the campaign he polled well against
Chafee, yet trailed the Democrats.
To the Beltway Republicans, that was all there was to it. In
head-to-head match-ups with Democratic candidate Sheldon
Whitehouse, Chafee was within the margin for error and Laffey
wasn't. Chafee was at least a possible winner while Laffey was a
likely loser.
Consequently, the NRSC funded a very negative campaign against
Laffey -- in no small part because it was difficult to run a
positive campaign that would encourage conservatives to vote for
Chafee. The GOP ran ads attacking Laffey for raising taxes and
allowing illegal immigrants to use consular ID cards from Mexico
and Guatemala, even though Chafee voted against all the Bush tax
cuts and supported amnesty.
On Iraq, abortion, Samuel Alito's confirmation, taxes, and
same-sex marriage Laffey agreed with the Republican base while
Chafee was on the other side. But on primary day, 54 percent of
Rhode Island Republicans agreed that the only vote that counted was
the one that allowed the GOP to organize the Senate, dashing
Laffey's hopes. In November, Democrats and independents felt the
same way and voted Chafee out of office by a similar margin.
Both Laffey and his GOP opponents had a point. It was wasteful
to expend so much time and money attacking an up-and-coming
Republican politician in order to prop up an unreliable senator who
might have pulled a Jim Jeffords in any event. Those
resources would have been better spent finding a primary challenger
for Conrad Burns or hiding George Allen until Election Day. But if
Chafee couldn't beat Whitehouse, Laffey didn't stand a chance.
If Laffey could have held onto the seat, the national party
would have given Chafee as little help as it provided the ill-fated
Bob Smith in his 2002 New Hampshire primary fight with John Sununu.
Reading Primary Mistake made me repent of my own pro-Chafee musings, but I doubt many GOP operatives
will be so moved.
Laffey downplays the substantial support he received from
outside groups like the Club for Growth, which are almost as
influential as the NRSC. He rarely mentions the extent to which his
critics were able to use his funny-guy routine against him, such as
when they unearthed articles he wrote as a College Republican at
Bowdoin. Laffey's oeuvre included such '80s-era chestnuts
as, " "When I hear it [Boy George] sing, 'Do you really want to
hurt me, do you really want to make me cry,' I say to myself, YES,
I want to punch your lights out, pal, and break your ribs."
In the end, Laffey's story is really about the frequently
ignored difference between the Republican Party and the
conservative movement. Political parties are about winning
elections and wielding power. Ideological movements are about ideas
and values. Confuse the two and you wind up with something like the
Chafee-Laffey primary contest.
topics:
Taxes, Business, Abortion, Constitution, Iraq, NATO, Oil