CONSERVATIVE ID
Re: Tom Bethell’s Darwinism
at AEI:
Some e-correspondents have alerted me to Tom Bethell’s remarks
in your July/August issue, relating to my appearance at the AEI
event “Darwin and Conservatism.”
Though it is not very nice to be called a liar in the public
prints, I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised. Creationists themselves
are not nice, in either the modern sense (pleasant to be around) or
the older one (painstakingly accurate). If memory serves, the judge
in the Kitzmiller v. Dover School Districtcase made some
astringent observations on that latter point. Much more evidence on
that point can be found in Creationism’s Trojan Horse, by
Barbara Forrest and Paul Gross — essential reading for anyone who
wants to know what the “Intelligent Design” road show is really all
about.
What it is not about is scientific research. At the
National Review meeting Bethell referred to, I asked Bruce
Chapman if he could give me a sample of the research undertaken by
the Discovery Institute — an instance of something the institute
had discovered, perhaps? Chapman at once whipped out a paper and
gave it to me. The paper can be read here. I invite
competent readers of The American Spectator to offer
opinions as to its value as research. This, please note, is not any
old paper. It is one that the Director of the Discovery Institute
carries around with him to show off to people who inquire about the
institute’s research results. It is, to put it another way, the
crowning glory of a quarter-century of well-funded activity over at
the Discovery Institute and its Center for Science and Culture.
There is really nothing else you need to know about the “research”
Chapman boasts of.
So far as my exchange with Michael Behe is concerned, I reported
it as I recall it. I distinctly recall his answering “No” to my
question, as the answer startled me. I had not expected him to be
so blunt. It is possible, I suppose, that he mis-apprehended my
question — there was some crosstalk going on at the time. I know
what I asked, though, and I know what he answered. If anything got
lost there, I don’t feel at fault, though I should be sorry to
think that anyone — even a creationist — believed himself
traduced by something I said in good faith. I should be especially
sorry in the case of Professor Behe, who strikes me as the least
shifty of a very shifty bunch. At least he had the guts to show up
and give evidence at Kitzmiller.
— John Derbyshire
Huntington, New York