Readers of the New York Times got a front-page example recently of what F.A. Hayek called “the fatal conceit” — the idea that some great mind or committee can do a better job than the private market in organizing and directing an economy.
Hayek argued that the market automatically coordinates the millions of individual activities in an economy by way of “natural, spontaneous and self-ordering processes of adaptation to a greater number of particular facts than any one mind can perceive or even conceive.”
The record of the past century shows that the system that delivers the goods, reduces scarcity and improves living standards is the “spontaneous human order created by a competitive market,” said Hayek, not the “deliberate arrangement of human interaction by central authority based on the collective command over available resources.”
What works, in short, is freedom and capitalism, not statism and socialism.
The Times article that supports Hayek’s line of reasoning — “Caps on Prices Only Deepen Zimbabweans’ Misery,” by Michael Wines — provides a perfect illustration of how the “fatal conceit” of government can turn a difficulty into a catastrophe.
“Robert G. Mugabe has ruled over this battered nation, his every wish endorsed by Parliament and enforced by the police and soldiers, for more than 27 years,” explained Wines. “It appears, however, that not even an unchallenged autocrat can repeal the laws of supply and demand.”
With prices doubling weekly, Mugabe’s attempt to revoke the laws of economics came via an anti-inflationary order, “Operation Slash Prices,” on June 25, ordering merchants to cut their prices by 50 percent.
“One month after Mr. Mugabe decreed just that, commanding merchants nationwide to counter 10,000-percent-a-year hyperinflation by slashing prices in half and more, Zimbabwe’s economy is at a halt,” reported Wines.
Most students with a passing grade in Economics 101 could have predicted that Mugabe’s decree would produce shortages. Cut the price of gasoline by law to a dollar per gallon, and there’ll be less supply and more demand — the formula for a shortage. Cut the price to 50 cents and we’ll be walking.
It’s the same with supply in the labor market. Cap the salaries of brain surgeons at $100,000 and there’ll be a shortage of brain surgeons.
Predictably, the results of Mugabe’s decree were catastrophic.
“Bread, sugar and cornmeal, staples of every Zimbabwean’s diet, have vanished, seized by mobs who denuded stores like locusts in wheat fields,” reported Wines. “Meat is virtually nonexistent, even for members of the middle class who have money to buy it on the black market. Gasoline is nearly unobtainable. Hospital patients are dying for lack of basic medical supplies. Power blackouts and water cutoffs are endemic.”
Similarly, the impact on manufacturing and jobs was ruinous: “Manufacturing has slowed to a crawl because few businesses can produce goods for less than the government-imposed sale prices. Raw materials are drying up because suppliers are being forced to sell to factories at a loss. Businesses are laying off workers or reducing their hours.”
With three-fourths of Zimbabwe’s labor force already jobless prior to Mugabe’s decree, the government’s prescription for bringing down inflation only worsened the nation’s poverty crisis. “Factory layoffs and slowdowns,” reported the Times, “are bringing new poverty to the 15 percent or 20 percent of adult Zimbabweans who still have jobs.”
To keep critics in line, a new law gives Zimbabwe’s security forces the right to observe as many e-mails and tap as many phones as they see fit.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?