By Peter Hannaford on 8.9.07 @ 12:07AM
Unless President Bush vetoes it and is upheld, make way for Creeping HillaryCare.
Unless President Bush vetoes it and is upheld, get out of the
way for Creeping HillaryCare. That is because a greatly expanded
SCHIPS (State Children's Health Insurance Program) was passed by
both houses of Congress just before the members fled Washington for
vacation.
SCHIPS had its origin in Hillary Clinton's 1993 health care
"reform" task force whose purpose was to bestow on us universal,
government-paid health care. One approach it proposed was to create
a Trojan Horse named Kids First. The task force report stated,
"Under this approach healthcare reform is phased in by population
(group), beginning with the most vulnerable of our
citizens--children." They also admitted that this "is really a
precursor to the new (universal) system."
Four years after HillaryCare was buried, a Republican Congress
passed legislation to create what it thought would be a modest
program, SCHIPS, to provide coverage for children in families whose
income was up to twice the poverty level. That is, $40,000.
Always calculating ways to enhance their position at the next
election, today's Democrat majorities found the perfect vehicle,
dramatic expansion of SCHIPS. They now define the "poor" as
families making four times the poverty rate, or $80,000 a year. Not
only that, "children" are redefined as being in that status up to
age 25. The legislation calls for all this to be "paid for" by a
$1-a-pack tax increase on cigarettes.
Smoking is unpopular, so who would oppose a tax increase on
cigarettes? There are two things wrong with this idea. First, the
cigarette tax is a very chancy thing on which to base the funding
of anything, especially something such as a program that will
almost certainly grow. Second, both anti-smoking education
campaigns and ever-higher cigarette prices are resulting in fewer
and fewer smokers every year. And add this ironic twist, smokers
are predominantly in lower-economic strata so that they will be
subsidizing what is a middle-class entitlement. One hopes they will
remember to thank Congressional Democrats.
Ronald Reagan once said, "The nearest thing to eternal life on
this earth is a government program." And this is one that will grow
and grow. If Congress were to override a Bush veto, watch for it to
expand again. Human nature being what it is, many eligible families
will drop their children from their private coverage and put them
under the "free" SCHIPS program. Thus, the pool of privately
insured would shrink and the rolls of those dependent upon
government would swell.
Congressional Republicans found it hard to resist this bad bill
dressed up, as it was, in the clothes of a noble cause, children's
health. Republican pollster Whit Ayres is quoted as saying
recently, "You can't construct a poll question on children and
health without getting an overwhelming majority in favor of giving
health insurance to children."
When the Senate voted a day after the House, 18 of 49 Republican
members were frightened enough over the possibility of being tagged
"against children" that they voted for a bill that will expand
again and again so long as the Democrats are in charge on Capitol
Hill, and especially if the doyenne of HillaryCare is, herself, in
charge of things at the White House come January 20, 2009. The only
way to say goodbye to Mr. SCHIPS this time around is a George Bush
veto, followed by heavy White House lobbying of Senate Republicans
so they will sustain it.
topics:
Education, Health Care, Hillary Clinton