By Mark Tooley on 7.11.07 @ 12:06AM
The religious left and the ACLU join forces to lecture Congress on proper interrogation techniques and have some liberal fun.
The ACLU threw an anti-torture rally on Capitol Hill late last
month, with a little help from comedian Greg Proops, and the
National Religious Coalition Against Torture (NRCAT).
"What I love about Dick Cheney is his fake window of health,"
Proops crooned. "Because he's about two green M&Ms away from
complete coronary meltdown. He's like half a Ho-Ho from having his
aorta congeal into a hockey puck and fire out his ass."
Who's to say that fighting torture cannot be mixed with a little
fun!?
"I didn't know you were going to send the Wal-Mart assistant
manager," Proops recounted of the typical foreign head of state
upon meeting President Bush. "Sure, you can talk to someone in
charge -- he's lying over here on a gurney with a defibrillator
stuck inside him. I've got him on the 'clapper' -- I'll wake him up
for you. Clap on, Mr. Cheney! Clap off! Dick Cheney is doing such a
great job as president."
Rally organizers claimed several thousand rallied against
torture and enjoyed the Proop's comedic performance. Other press
accounts put the crowd in the hundreds. Whatever the number, the
speaker list was top-heavy with Democratic members of Congress:
Senator Pat Leahy, Senator Tom Harkin, Senator Ben Cardin, Senator
Chris Dodd, Representative Jerald Nadler, Representative Dennis
Kucinich.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi could not make it, but the crowd was
assured of her good wishes. "She frightened everybody here in
Washington to death because she has a uterus and a brain and she
can use them both," Proop chortled.
"Are there any 'card carrying members' in the house?" asked ACLU
executive director Anthony Romero, with equal comedic effect, to
cheers and laughter. "This is a remarkable day, when true patriots
storm Capitol Hill to demand the return of our basic liberties and
basic rights. We've lived through some very dark times over these
last six years, but we're making progress."
Amnesty International's Larry Cox was a little more explicit.
"The present administration has taken our flag...and has raised it
over Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, secret detention sites, made it a
recruitment poster for terror. We, we are here to say today, 'We
want our flag back!'"
With equal indignation, the Islamic Society of America's Ingrid
Matson recounted that Muslims in America had warned newly arrived
immigrants not to take American liberties for granted, with
American slavery in mind, 150 years ago.
"The Koran says, 'Do not let hatred of others toward you make
you swerve from justice," Matson recounted.. "Torture is a major
transgression of God's limits. The impact of such a transgression
is not just on the victim, but on the souls of all those engaged in
and complicit in this evil act."
Perhaps most interesting among the rally's sponsors was the
National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT), which has
specifically highlighted evangelicals who oppose Bush
Administration policies.
"The religious community and millions of others across the
nation are deeply concerned that U.S.-sponsored torture, and other
denials of human rights, have diminished the goodness of our
nation," NCAT's Rich Kilmer told the rally. "The religious
community has concluded that torture is a moral issue."
NCAT has declined to delve fully into the details of what should
or should not be permitted in interrogation. To specifically reject
some practices would imply permission for other questionable
practices, they profess. Instead, they assume the truth of the
worst bumper sticker allegations against U.S. policies, and
denounce "torture" by the U.S. without really defining it.
Kilmer recounted, non-controversially: "Religions require
adherence to protect the dignity of human beings; to treat everyone
with compassion -- including our enemies; to welcome all people,
even those of a different religion or tradition; to work for
fairness and justice for all."
That the debates over U.S. detention policies might benefit from
more theological nuance does not seem to occur to Kilmer and the
NCAT. Speaking at more length for NCAT was Methodist ethicist and
left-wing blogger Chuck Gutenson from evangelical Asbury Seminary
outside Lexington, Kentucky.
"On what basis, however, are we normally assured that torture of
detainees is an acceptable practice?" Gutenson asked. "Everyone
agrees, as far as I can tell, that gratuitously creating pain in
others is a heinous evil."
Gutenson described the purported supporters of torture by the
U.S. as justifying the evil by claiming lives will be saved by the
extracted intelligence.
"One member of the Supreme Court recently responded to the
torture question, not by appeal to hard fact, but rather by asking
what jury would convict Jack Bauer," Gutenson remembered, referring
to Justice Antonin Scalia. "Thereby this Supreme Court justice
conflated reality and drama in such a way as to create the illusion
that a scenario from the hit TV series 24 was an accurate
representation of the world in which torture is used."
But Scalia has not been alone in his reference to 24.
National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) lobbyist Richard Cizik,
in touting NAE's new statement against supposed U.S. policies of
torture, reportedly said: "If you don't think torture is a topic
worthy of a statement, just watch 24."
Unfortunately, much of the debate about "torture" by the U.S.
revolves around vague assumptions, shaped more by fiction than by
reality.
"Jesus not only commanded, but also modeled a way of life that
refused to repay evil with evil," Gutenson declared. "When His
enemies came for him, He embodied the call to love our enemies.
How, then, can we who seek to imitate this Jesus ever see torture
as a legitimate toll wielded to serve our own purposes?"
With or without torture, Jesus would never have served as a
prison interrogator, any more than He would have led a rally on
Capitol Hill, with the ACLU, or anybody else. Simply asking What
Would Jesus Do, no more than referencing plot lines from
24, contributes almost nothing to debates about U.S.
detention policies.
topics:
Nancy Pelosi, Religion, Islam, Supreme Court, NATO