By Lisa Fabrizio on 7.11.07 @ 12:06AM
With the return of the Latin Mass, the two forms of the Roman Rite may influence each other in positive ways.
Go find a tranquil place, close your eyes and think back. You
were much younger than you are now, quite possibly a child. Your
mind's eye conjures up what seemed like a vast and majestic palace
with the rising wisps of sweet-smelling incense leading your gaze
upward toward what you thought must surely be Heaven. The altar
boys, who only hours before were your rambunctious playmates, have
been transformed into cherubic servants of God.
Your parents and neighbors kneel close by; your mother's veiled
head bowed low, deep in prayer amidst the sacred silence. There is
no band, no choir in sight; in fact, there are no performers
anywhere to behold. On the altar, the priest addresses God in the
same language that Pontius Pilate used in reference to our beaten
and bloodied Savior: "Ecce homo." You are in a pre-Vatican II
Catholic Church worshiping God with wonder, awe, and reverence.
For those not old enough to recollect these wonderful memories,
you may soon get your chance. With the release of his long-awaited
Motu Proprio, "Summorum Pontificum" Pope Benedict XVI has
rescued the so-called Traditional Latin Mass from decades of
undeserved and unauthorized obscurity. While making clear that the
Novus Ordo, or new Mass, would be the ordinary form of the Roman
Rite, he established that the older form "must be given due honor
for its venerable and ancient usage."
These are words that a goodly number of Catholics have longed
for years to hear. When the "spirit" of Vatican II changes were
adopted, many thousands of the faithful lost faith. The thinking
being, that in the crazed cauldron of the 1960s, if the unmovable
Church could change with the times, all was lost. Old women
bewailed the "desanctification" of saints like Christopher, folk
masses confused parents who wanted to insulate their children from
pop culture and everyone wondered about Purgatory.
Especially for young women -- against whom the sexual revolution
was a great act of moral violence -- the impervious shield of the
Church seemed to have been fatally weakened. If, for example, we no
longer had to cover our heads in church, we were just like "other
girls," and so we became. The notions of modesty and chastity for
Catholic girls were particularly mocked by the culture of that
time, and a Church undergoing such upheaval had not the weapons to
fight for them.
In truth, we were all laboring under the misconception --
greatly enhanced by the world's panting media -- that we did not
leave the Church, she had "left us." Thankfully, we were as wrong
about that as anyone will ever be about anything in this life.
Because essentially, the root of Catholic worship has never
changed, and cannot change as long as the Holy Sacrifice of the
Mass is at its heart.
The re-presentation of Christ's death and resurrection: Christ
as both victim and priest; the giver and the gift of the bread of
life and cup of eternal salvation; this is the Mass. And as long as
it is celebrated reverently, either form will do. But the confusion
which led to the state of the Novus Ordo Mass as it is often
celebrated today has, in some places led to a dire irreverence, and
it is this that the Holy Father seeks to dispel by "freeing" the
Latin Mass.
It is easy to see why today's Catholics are so attached to the
new Mass. Because, like so much of modern culture, it is morally
easy. It is easy to understand, easy on the ears and it's an easy
way to satisfy what many see as a tiresome requirement that
interrupts their Sunday ritual of football and fun. This attitude
is an anathema to belief in critical dogma like the True Presence
of Christ in the Eucharist: lex orandi, lex credendi; as
the law of the liturgy goes, so too the faith.
It is hoped that the two forms of the Roman Rite will influence
each other in positive ways. Indeed, some parishes have already
incorporated Latin within the Novus Ordo and it is expected that
the Tridentine Mass will use the vernacular in its readings. Both
will enable more awe, reverence and wonder; those qualities of a
child which our Lord enjoins on us in order to gain the Kingdom of
God.
Are there divisions in the Church? There are now and have been,
even when the Apostles walked the earth. Were there not, St. Paul
wouldn't have written most of his beautiful letters to those pesky
presbyters in the nascent Church. Indeed, schisms and heresies have
often lead to the Church defining or redefining its teachings for
the sake of unity, and the Motu Proprio may be a prime example of
that. Through it, the Church Militant; that is, all Catholics still
living here on this earth, have been joined more closely in the
charity so desired by our Lord:
And the glory that thou hast given me, I have given to
them, that they may be one, even as we are one: I in them and thou
in me; that they may be perfected in unity, and that the world may
know that thou hast sent me, and that thou hast loved them even as
thou hast loved me. (Jn 17: 22-23)
Lisa Fabrizio is a columnist who hails from
Connecticut. You may write her at mailbox@lisafab.com.
topics:
Law