(Page 6 of 10)
br> South San Francisco, California /p>Thanks for the reminder of how the perpetually power-lusting donkeys operate. But "victory at any cost" -- and the impact on all of us, our allies and whoever else happens to get in their way be damned -- appears to have been the overarching tenet of their party since way back when.
Of course, President Bush's and the Republican Party's having gone AWOL from their leadership roles sustain such chose-defeat-over-victory, America-is-always-to-blame, emasculate-America's-strength behavior.
p>Makes you wonder if we have the societal will and common sense to stay a free people. br> -- C. Kenna Amos br> Princeton, West Virginia /p>I would like to identify myself with every single word of Mr. Emanuel's article. He has absolutely nailed the complicity of the Democrats in becoming determined to defeat our nation, to hold our nation captive before the whole world.
I hope that Mr. Emanuel will follow up this excellent article with an equally forthright article on the failure of Bush, the White House staff, or any in the administration to take on these traitors in the Congress. We can add this to the list of things that Bush refuses to take on the Democrats about. Failure to actively defend his judicial nominations comes immediately to mind.
p>I guess that Bush is too busy castigating the people that voted him into office for their bigotry in not wanting to throw open our borders to Mexico, to take on the Dems who are with him on his Bush-Kennedy Amnesty bill. br> -- Ken Shreve br> New Hampshire
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.