(Page 5 of 15)
Mr. Murray posits that "existing carbon trading schemes are vastly inefficient, open to fraud or both" He also holds that "attempting to modify behavior through carbon pricing will fail or impose significant social costs of its own."
p>Duhhhhhhhh! Al Gore owns a carbon trading company. Knowing this, why would one expect anything other than fraud, inefficiency and a huge social cost -- all wrapped in failure? Those are the principles that govern the radical liberal's life. br> -- Jay Molyneaux br> Denver, North Carolina /p> p> GREASE MERCHANTS br> Re: Ben Stein's Stupak's Stupidity : /p>I usually agree with Mr. Stein's point of view but his Stupak column misses a lot of points.
1. Gas is a necessity.
I tried to visualize living without the internal combustion engine and although I could go and ride a bike or horse, it is just a reasonable solution
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.